RFLR vs. TRIO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RFLR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF) and TRIO (MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RFLR returned 28.68% vs 14.92% for TRIO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for TRIO.

Performance

RFLR vs. TRIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) and MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFLR achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly higher than TRIO's 5.81% return.

RFLR

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 3.69%
• YTD: 11.27%
• 6M: 9.19%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRIO

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 5.81%
• 6M: 5.48%
• 1Y: 14.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFLR vs. TRIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF	11.27%	16.62%
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF	5.81%	11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between RFLR and TRIO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	0.76

The correlation between RFLR and TRIO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RFLR vs. TRIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFLR

RFLR Risk / Return Rank: 80
RFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
RFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
RFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
RFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 86

TRIO

TRIO Risk / Return Rank: 80
TRIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
TRIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TRIO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
TRIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
TRIO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFLR vs. TRIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) and MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RFLR	TRIO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.42	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	3.54	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.48	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.98	3.35	+1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.54	16.75	+0.79

RFLR vs. TRIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFLR Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the TRIO Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFLR and TRIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RFLR vs. TRIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFLR drawdown since its inception was -15.48%, which is greater than TRIO's maximum drawdown of -9.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFLR and TRIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFLR	TRIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.48%	-9.88%	-5.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.79%	-4.47%	-1.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.10%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-0.78%	-2.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	0.89%	+0.75%

Volatility

RFLR vs. TRIO - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) at 1.62%. This indicates that RFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFLR	TRIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	1.62%	+2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.77%	4.95%	+3.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.55%	6.20%	+6.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.28%	10.58%	+1.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.28%	10.58%	+1.70%

RFLR vs. TRIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than TRIO's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFLR vs. TRIO - Dividend Comparison

RFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than TRIO's 8.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF	0.60%	0.67%	0.26%
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF	8.51%	9.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFLR and TRIO in my portfolio?

RFLR and TRIO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RFLR or TRIO?

RFLR has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to TRIO (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFLR dropped -15.48% vs TRIO's -9.88%.

Which ETF is better, RFLR or TRIO?

On 1-year performance, RFLR leads with 28.68% vs 14.92% for TRIO. On fees, TRIO is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, TRIO has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RFLR or TRIO?

Over the 1-year period, RFLR has performed better with a 28.68% return vs 14.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RFLR or TRIO?

TRIO is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RFLR or TRIO?

TRIO has the higher dividend yield at 8.51%, compared with 0.60% for RFLR.

What is the main difference between RFLR and TRIO?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ETF Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for RFLR and 0.70% for TRIO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.