XTR vs. QQHG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG).

XTR and QQHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XTR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. QQHG is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on May 5, 2025.

Performance

XTR vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XTR vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF	-4.49%	19.44%
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	-1.76%	20.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTR achieves a -4.49% return, which is significantly lower than QQHG's -1.76% return.

XTR

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -4.87%
• YTD: -4.49%
• 6M: -3.05%
• 1Y: 13.75%
• 3Y*: 15.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQHG

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: -1.76%
• 6M: 0.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTR vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.

QQHG

Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF

XTR

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

Return for Risk

XTR vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTR

XTR Risk / Return Rank: 57
XTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
XTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
XTR Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XTR Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTR vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XTR	QQHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.30	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XTR	QQHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	2.17	-1.65

Correlation

The correlation between XTR and QQHG is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XTR vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison

XTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.66%, more than QQHG's 0.23% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF	18.66%	17.82%	20.89%	1.09%	1.08%	2.32%
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	0.23%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

XTR vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTR drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, which is greater than QQHG's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR and QQHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTR	QQHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.83%	-6.18%	-14.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.17%	-3.64%	-2.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.13%	-1.06%	-5.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XTR	QQHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.17%	9.60%	+3.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.87%	9.60%	+4.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.87%	9.60%	+4.27%