PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTR vs. HUSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTR vs. HUSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Huber Small Cap Value Fund (HUSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTR achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly lower than HUSIX's 11.93% return.


XTR

1D
-0.65%
1M
5.03%
YTD
8.67%
6M
8.51%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
10Y*

HUSIX

1D
0.59%
1M
0.84%
YTD
11.93%
6M
15.00%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
12.90%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTR vs. HUSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XTR
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF
8.67%13.66%21.85%21.16%-17.67%4.43%
HUSIX
Huber Small Cap Value Fund
11.93%3.28%10.17%17.86%-4.92%1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between XTR and HUSIX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021

0.68

The correlation between XTR and HUSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTR vs. HUSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTR
XTR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HUSIX
HUSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
HUSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
HUSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTR vs. HUSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Huber Small Cap Value Fund (HUSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTRHUSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.61

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.51

6.87

+4.65

XTR vs. HUSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the HUSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTR and HUSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTRHUSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

1.47

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.28

+0.44

Drawdowns

XTR vs. HUSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTR drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, smaller than the maximum HUSIX drawdown of -69.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR and HUSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTRHUSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.83%

-69.93%

+49.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-10.03%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-27.31%

+12.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.15%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-13.27%

+7.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

3.81%

-1.82%

Volatility

XTR vs. HUSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) is 2.99%, while Huber Small Cap Value Fund (HUSIX) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that XTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTRHUSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.58%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

11.80%

-3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.76%

17.79%

-7.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

21.33%

-7.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.78%

23.89%

-10.11%

XTR vs. HUSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HUSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTR vs. HUSIX - Dividend Comparison

XTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.40%, more than HUSIX's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HUSIX
Huber Small Cap Value Fund
0.97%1.08%0.11%0.34%0.00%0.96%0.42%0.07%0.19%0.71%1.17%0.61%
XTR
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF
16.40%17.82%20.89%1.09%1.08%2.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTR and HUSIX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUSIX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to XTR (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTR dropped -20.83% vs HUSIX's -69.93%.

XTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTR and HUSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer