PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUSIX vs. ARSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HUSIX vs. ARSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huber Small Cap Value Fund (HUSIX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUSIX achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly higher than ARSMX's 2.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HUSIX having a 10.10% annualized return and ARSMX not far behind at 9.82%.


HUSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.87%
YTD
12.31%
6M
11.43%
1Y
25.09%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
10.10%

ARSMX

1D
-0.41%
1M
1.99%
YTD
2.31%
6M
0.93%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
9.21%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUSIX vs. ARSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUSIX
Huber Small Cap Value Fund
12.31%3.28%10.17%17.86%-4.92%29.50%-5.34%33.99%-18.73%11.74%
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
2.31%-0.83%12.42%14.48%-8.62%23.41%1.71%34.82%-6.44%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between HUSIX and ARSMX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007

0.86

The correlation between HUSIX and ARSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUSIX vs. ARSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUSIX
HUSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HUSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
HUSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ARSMX
ARSMX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ARSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUSIX vs. ARSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huber Small Cap Value Fund (HUSIX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HUSIXARSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.05

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

0.31

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.72

0.71

+6.01

HUSIX vs. ARSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the ARSMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUSIX and ARSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HUSIX vs. ARSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUSIX drawdown since its inception was -69.93%, which is greater than ARSMX's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUSIX and ARSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUSIXARSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.93%

-51.75%

-18.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-10.37%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.31%

-19.34%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.31%

-19.34%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.37%

-42.96%

-5.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-5.36%

+3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.23%

-8.10%

-5.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

4.48%

-0.68%

Volatility

HUSIX vs. ARSMX - Volatility Comparison

Huber Small Cap Value Fund (HUSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) at 3.05%. This indicates that HUSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUSIXARSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

3.05%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.14%

10.27%

+1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

14.45%

+3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.31%

17.76%

+3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.89%

19.58%

+4.31%

HUSIX vs. ARSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ARSMX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

HUSIX vs. ARSMX - Dividend Comparison

HUSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while ARSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%9.27%3.89%4.85%5.86%0.00%3.60%8.60%15.66%8.03%17.82%
HUSIX
Huber Small Cap Value Fund
0.96%1.08%0.11%0.34%0.00%0.96%0.42%0.07%0.19%0.71%1.17%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


HUSIX and ARSMX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUSIX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to ARSMX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUSIX dropped -69.93% vs ARSMX's -51.75%.

HUSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUSIX and ARSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer