PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTR vs. HEDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTR vs. HEDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF (HEDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTR achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly higher than HEDG's 2.64% return.


XTR

1D
-0.65%
1M
5.03%
YTD
8.67%
6M
8.51%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
10Y*

HEDG

1D
0.00%
1M
0.64%
YTD
2.64%
6M
3.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTR vs. HEDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XTR and HEDG is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.80

XTR vs. HEDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XTR
HEDG

Technology

35.6%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.9%

Communication Services

11.2%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.4%

Industrials

8.3%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

XTR
35.6%
HEDG
36.2%

Financial Services

XTR
11.8%
HEDG
11.9%

Communication Services

XTR
11.2%
HEDG
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XTR
10.1%
HEDG
10.1%

Healthcare

XTR
8.5%
HEDG
8.4%

Industrials

XTR
8.3%
HEDG
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

XTR
4.9%
HEDG
4.9%

Energy

XTR
3.5%
HEDG
3.5%

Utilities

XTR
2.4%
HEDG
2.3%

Real Estate

XTR
1.9%
HEDG
1.9%

Basic Materials

XTR
1.8%
HEDG
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTR vs. HEDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTR
XTR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HEDG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTR vs. HEDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF (HEDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTRHEDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.51

XTR vs. HEDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTRHEDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.60

-0.88

Drawdowns

XTR vs. HEDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTR drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, which is greater than HEDG's maximum drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR and HEDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTRHEDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.83%

-3.85%

-16.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

0.00%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-0.39%

-5.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

Volatility

XTR vs. HEDG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTRHEDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.76%

5.90%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

5.90%

+7.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.78%

5.90%

+7.88%

XTR vs. HEDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HEDG's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTR vs. HEDG - Dividend Comparison

XTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.40%, more than HEDG's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HEDG
Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF
1.84%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XTR
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF
16.40%17.82%20.89%1.09%1.08%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTR and HEDG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XTR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XTR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for HEDG.

XTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.40%, compared with 1.84% for HEDG.

XTR tracks Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index, while HEDG tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Equable Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XTR and 0.96% for HEDG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTR and HEDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer