HEDG vs. PHDG
HEDG (Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF) and PHDG (Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds - HEDG tracks the Actively Managed while PHDG tracks the S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HEDG charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PHDG.
Performance
HEDG vs. PHDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEDG achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly lower than PHDG's 10.56% return.
HEDG
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHDG
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 21.44%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.12%
HEDG vs. PHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HEDG Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF | 2.98% | 3.20% |
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 10.56% | 1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEDG and PHDG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEDG vs. PHDG — Risk / Return Rank
HEDG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PHDG
HEDG vs. PHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF (HEDG) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEDG | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEDG vs. PHDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEDG drawdown since its inception was -3.85%, smaller than the maximum PHDG drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEDG and PHDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEDG | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.85% | -17.70% | +13.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -5.01% | +4.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.39% | -6.23% | +5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.24% | — |
Volatility
HEDG vs. PHDG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEDG | PHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.87% | 11.39% | -5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 11.40% | -5.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 12.15% | -6.28% |
HEDG vs. PHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEDG has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than PHDG's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEDG vs. PHDG - Dividend Comparison
HEDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than PHDG's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEDG Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF | 1.83% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF | 2.28% | 2.10% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 1.35% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 1.80% | 1.56% | 1.83% | 2.29% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEDG and PHDG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PHDG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PHDG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for HEDG.
PHDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.83% for HEDG.
HEDG tracks Actively Managed, while PHDG tracks S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index. They also come from different issuers: Equable Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for HEDG and 0.39% for PHDG.
Find the right allocation for HEDG and PHDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer