PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XTR.TO vs. GBAL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XTR.TO vs. GBAL.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XTR.TO (iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF) and GBAL.TO (iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from iShares. XTR.TO is passively managed, while GBAL.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XTR.TO returned 6.00%/yr vs 9.01%/yr for GBAL.TO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XTR.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GBAL.TO.

Performance

XTR.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF (XTR.TO) and iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio (GBAL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTR.TO achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly lower than GBAL.TO's 9.21% return.

XTR.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
2.50%
YTD
6.55%
6M
6.45%
1Y
13.02%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
5.99%

GBAL.TO

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.86%
YTD
9.21%
6M
7.46%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTR.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XTR.TO
iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF		6.55%8.54%12.80%4.95%-4.48%10.17%5.13%
GBAL.TO
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio		9.21%11.77%17.38%14.48%-11.94%11.32%6.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XTR.TO and GBAL.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2020

0.43

The correlation between XTR.TO and GBAL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

XTR.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XTR.TO
GBAL.TO

Financial Services

26.2%
18.1%

Energy

16.1%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

11.3%
1.7%

Technology

9.1%
22.2%

Utilities

8.0%
0.6%

Industrials

7.1%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
3.1%

Healthcare

5.6%
2.9%

Basic Materials

5.6%
4.5%

Communication Services

3.8%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.9%

Financial Services

XTR.TO
26.2%
GBAL.TO
18.1%

Energy

XTR.TO
16.1%
GBAL.TO
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

XTR.TO
11.3%
GBAL.TO
1.7%

Technology

XTR.TO
9.1%
GBAL.TO
22.2%

Utilities

XTR.TO
8.0%
GBAL.TO
0.6%

Industrials

XTR.TO
7.1%
GBAL.TO
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XTR.TO
6.4%
GBAL.TO
3.1%

Healthcare

XTR.TO
5.6%
GBAL.TO
2.9%

Basic Materials

XTR.TO
5.6%
GBAL.TO
4.5%

Communication Services

XTR.TO
3.8%
GBAL.TO
1.8%

Real Estate

XTR.TO
0.9%
GBAL.TO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF

iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio

Often compared with XTR.TO:
XTR.TO vs. FIE.TOXTR.TO vs. ZMI.TOXTR.TO vs. XDIV.TOXTR.TO vs. XCNS.TOXTR.TO vs. XEQT.TOXTR.TO vs. XEI.TOXTR.TO vs. VRIF.TO
Often compared with GBAL.TO:
GBAL.TO vs. XBAL.TOGBAL.TO vs. EAORGBAL.TO vs. GEQT.TOGBAL.TO vs. XIN.TOGBAL.TO vs. GGRO.TOGBAL.TO vs. VBAL.TOGBAL.TO vs. VFV.TO

Return for Risk

XTR.TO vs. GBAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XTR.TO
XTR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XTR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XTR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
GBAL.TO
GBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTR.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF (XTR.TO) and iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio (GBAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XTR.TOGBAL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.85
1.91

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.22
2.78

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.36

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

2.81

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.48

11.18

+6.31

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XTR.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the GBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTR.TO and GBAL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XTR.TOGBAL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

1.91

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.93

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.03

-0.63

Drawdowns

XTR.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTR.TO drawdown since its inception was -51.42%, which is greater than GBAL.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR.TO and GBAL.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XTR.TOGBAL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.42%

-18.92%

-32.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.29%

-6.40%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.06%

-10.24%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.74%

-18.92%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.92%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.24%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-4.30%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

1.61%

-0.86%

Volatility

XTR.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF (XTR.TO) is 1.60%, while iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio (GBAL.TO) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that XTR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XTR.TOGBAL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

3.20%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.75%

7.87%

-4.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.59%

9.42%

-4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.27%

9.70%

-3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.33%

9.54%

-1.21%

XTR.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTR.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than GBAL.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

XTR.TO vs. GBAL.TO - Dividend Comparison

XTR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than GBAL.TO's 1.71% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBAL.TO
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio		1.71%1.83%1.84%2.40%1.87%1.43%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XTR.TO
iShares Diversified Monthly Income ETF		3.92%4.10%4.27%4.61%4.62%4.21%5.56%5.38%5.75%5.24%5.30%6.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

XTR.TO and GBAL.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBAL.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XTR.TO.

Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XTR.TO and 0.25% for GBAL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTR.TO and GBAL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer