Correlation
The correlation between GBAL.TO and XBAL.TO is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
GBAL.TO vs. XBAL.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio (GBAL.TO) and iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO).
GBAL.TO and XBAL.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GBAL.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Sep 2, 2020. XBAL.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jun 21, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GBAL.TO or XBAL.TO.
Performance
GBAL.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
GBAL.TO:
1.13
XBAL.TO:
1.20
GBAL.TO:
1.61
XBAL.TO:
1.69
GBAL.TO:
1.22
XBAL.TO:
1.25
GBAL.TO:
1.19
XBAL.TO:
1.28
GBAL.TO:
4.49
XBAL.TO:
5.74
GBAL.TO:
2.72%
XBAL.TO:
2.09%
GBAL.TO:
10.86%
XBAL.TO:
9.81%
GBAL.TO:
-18.92%
XBAL.TO:
-28.78%
GBAL.TO:
-0.80%
XBAL.TO:
-0.47%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBAL.TO achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly higher than XBAL.TO's 2.67% return.
GBAL.TO
3.10%
4.99%
1.50%
12.29%
11.50%
N/A
N/A
XBAL.TO
2.67%
4.03%
2.39%
11.73%
9.64%
8.07%
6.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GBAL.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBAL.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XBAL.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GBAL.TO vs. XBAL.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GBAL.TO
XBAL.TO
GBAL.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio (GBAL.TO) and iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
GBAL.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Dividend Comparison
GBAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than XBAL.TO's 1.95% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBAL.TO iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio | 1.84% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 1.87% | 1.44% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XBAL.TO iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio | 1.95% | 1.96% | 1.83% | 1.62% | 1.40% | 1.51% | 1.73% | 2.65% | 2.30% | 2.78% | 2.60% | 5.79% |
Drawdowns
GBAL.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.92%, smaller than the maximum XBAL.TO drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBAL.TO and XBAL.TO.
Loading data...
Volatility
GBAL.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio (GBAL.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO) at 2.28%. This indicates that GBAL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...