Correlation
The correlation between GBAL.TO and GEQT.TO is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
GBAL.TO vs. GEQT.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio (GBAL.TO) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO).
GBAL.TO and GEQT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GBAL.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Sep 2, 2020. GEQT.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Sep 2, 2020.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GBAL.TO or GEQT.TO.
Performance
GBAL.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
GBAL.TO:
1.02
GEQT.TO:
0.89
GBAL.TO:
1.46
GEQT.TO:
1.32
GBAL.TO:
1.20
GEQT.TO:
1.19
GBAL.TO:
1.06
GEQT.TO:
0.88
GBAL.TO:
4.02
GEQT.TO:
3.49
GBAL.TO:
2.71%
GEQT.TO:
4.27%
GBAL.TO:
10.78%
GEQT.TO:
16.42%
GBAL.TO:
-18.92%
GEQT.TO:
-23.65%
GBAL.TO:
-2.11%
GEQT.TO:
-2.33%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBAL.TO achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than GEQT.TO's 3.01% return.
GBAL.TO
1.73%
3.60%
0.15%
10.71%
11.65%
N/A
N/A
GEQT.TO
3.01%
6.81%
0.22%
14.57%
16.15%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GBAL.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GBAL.TO and GEQT.TO have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GBAL.TO vs. GEQT.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GBAL.TO
GEQT.TO
GBAL.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio (GBAL.TO) and iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
GBAL.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
GBAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than GEQT.TO's 1.37% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBAL.TO iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio | 1.87% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 1.87% | 1.44% | 0.96% |
GEQT.TO iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.32% | 0.87% |
Drawdowns
GBAL.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.92%, smaller than the maximum GEQT.TO drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBAL.TO and GEQT.TO.
Loading data...
Volatility
GBAL.TO vs. GEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Balanced ETF Portfolio (GBAL.TO) is 2.33%, while iShares ESG Equity ETF Portfolio (GEQT.TO) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that GBAL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...