PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTOC vs. LAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTOC vs. LAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTOC achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly higher than LAPR's 3.32% return.


XTOC

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.52%
YTD
7.31%
6M
8.16%
1Y
18.28%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
10Y*

LAPR

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.72%
YTD
3.32%
6M
3.77%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTOC vs. LAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XTOC and LAPR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.63

The correlation between XTOC and LAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTOC vs. LAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTOC
XTOC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XTOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTOC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XTOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTOC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LAPR
LAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
LAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTOC vs. LAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTOCLAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.00

5.58

-3.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.86

12.13

-9.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

2.93

-1.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

29.36

-26.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.28

144.96

-131.68

XTOC vs. LAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTOC Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is lower than the LAPR Sharpe Ratio of 5.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTOC and LAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTOCLAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

5.58

-3.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.97

-1.39

Drawdowns

XTOC vs. LAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTOC drawdown since its inception was -24.09%, which is greater than LAPR's maximum drawdown of -3.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTOC and LAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTOCLAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.09%

-3.81%

-20.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-0.24%

-7.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.12%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-0.11%

-4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

0.05%

+1.33%

Volatility

XTOC vs. LAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) at 0.32%. This indicates that XTOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTOCLAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

0.32%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

1.00%

+6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.19%

1.27%

+7.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

3.30%

+11.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

3.30%

+11.86%

XTOC vs. LAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XTOC and LAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

XTOC vs. LAPR - Dividend Comparison

XTOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LAPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XTOC and LAPR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTOC has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to LAPR (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTOC dropped -24.09% vs LAPR's -3.81%.

On 1-year performance, XTOC leads with 18.28% vs 7.01% for LAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, LAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XTOC has performed better with a 18.28% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTOC and LAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

LAPR has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 0.00% for XTOC.

LAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTOC and LAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer