PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTL vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTL vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTL achieves a 51.46% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.63% return.


XTL

1D
0.12%
1M
2.37%
YTD
51.46%
6M
55.42%
1Y
120.69%
3Y*
45.66%
5Y*
19.06%
10Y*
16.10%

SGOV

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTL vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XTL
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF
51.46%44.95%34.89%-1.17%-19.18%21.58%22.28%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.63%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between XTL and SGOV is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020

-0.02

The correlation between XTL and SGOV shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.02 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTL vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTL
XTL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
XTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTL vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTLSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-269.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

194.55

-192.97

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.26

396.11

-387.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.62

4,438.60

-4,403.98

XTL vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTL Sharpe Ratio is 4.04, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTL and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTL vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTL drawdown since its inception was -37.01%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTL and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTLSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.01%

-0.03%

-36.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.70%

-0.01%

-14.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

-0.01%

-22.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.01%

-0.03%

-36.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.61%

0.00%

-6.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-0.00%

-9.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

0.00%

+3.50%

Volatility

XTL vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.05%. This indicates that XTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTLSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.24%

0.05%

+11.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.21%

0.13%

+24.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.10%

0.19%

+29.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.35%

0.24%

+25.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

0.24%

+23.43%

XTL vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTL vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than SGOV's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XTL
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF
0.86%1.05%0.62%0.80%0.74%1.25%0.88%0.92%1.90%2.08%1.11%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTL and SGOV have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTL has higher volatility (11.24%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTL dropped -37.01% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 5-year performance, XTL leads with 19.06% vs 3.56% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XTL has performed better with a 19.06% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XTL.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.86% for XTL.

XTL is categorized as Communications Equities, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTL and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.33 vs 4.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTL and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer