XTL vs. FBMPX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) and FBMPX (Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio) are both Communications Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, XTL returned 16.95%/yr vs 17.26%/yr for FBMPX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XTL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FBMPX.

Performance

XTL vs. FBMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTL achieves a 62.17% return, which is significantly higher than FBMPX's 10.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XTL having a 16.95% annualized return and FBMPX not far ahead at 17.26%.

XTL

• 1D: 3.28%
• 1M: 8.43%
• YTD: 62.17%
• 6M: 70.46%
• 1Y: 143.57%
• 3Y*: 50.79%
• 5Y*: 20.95%
• 10Y*: 16.95%

FBMPX

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 10.75%
• 6M: 12.64%
• 1Y: 41.10%
• 3Y*: 34.92%
• 5Y*: 14.37%
• 10Y*: 17.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTL vs. FBMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF	62.17%	44.95%	34.89%	-1.17%	-19.18%	21.58%	22.46%	12.51%	-6.60%	0.56%
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio	10.75%	37.07%	35.98%	56.85%	-38.30%	15.97%	35.48%	33.14%	-3.52%	12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between XTL and FBMPX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011	0.62

The correlation between XTL and FBMPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XTL vs. FBMPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XTL	FBMPX
Technology	61.4%	13.1%
Communication Services	36.1%	83.1%
Real Estate	2.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.7%
Industrials	-	0.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XTL vs. FBMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTL

XTL Risk / Return Rank: 96
XTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
XTL Omega Ratio Rank: 94
XTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
XTL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FBMPX

FBMPX Risk / Return Rank: 50
FBMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FBMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FBMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FBMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FBMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTL vs. FBMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XTL	FBMPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.02	2.26	+2.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.29	3.04	+2.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.39	+0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.91	2.57	+7.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	45.66	9.74	+35.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XTL vs. FBMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTL Sharpe Ratio is 5.02, which is higher than the FBMPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTL and FBMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XTL	FBMPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.02	2.26	+2.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.62	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.79	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.65	-0.11

Drawdowns

XTL vs. FBMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTL drawdown since its inception was -37.01%, smaller than the maximum FBMPX drawdown of -61.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTL and FBMPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTL	FBMPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.01%	-61.77%	+24.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.70%	-16.90%	+2.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.79%	-23.20%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.01%	-47.42%	+10.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.01%	-47.42%	+10.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.38%	+2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.77%	-10.63%	+0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	4.45%	-1.26%

Volatility

XTL vs. FBMPX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) at 4.62%. This indicates that XTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTL	FBMPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.05%	4.62%	+3.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.61%	13.89%	+8.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.78%	19.02%	+9.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.04%	23.25%	+1.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.51%	21.96%	+1.55%

XTL vs. FBMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FBMPX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

XTL vs. FBMPX - Dividend Comparison

XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than FBMPX's 12.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio	12.09%	8.09%	7.05%	0.00%	0.00%	5.88%	3.74%	35.43%	15.29%	5.53%	7.50%	7.29%
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF	0.80%	1.05%	0.62%	0.80%	0.74%	1.25%	0.88%	0.92%	1.90%	2.08%	1.11%	1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTL and FBMPX in my portfolio?

XTL and FBMPX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XTL or FBMPX?

XTL has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to FBMPX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTL dropped -37.01% vs FBMPX's -61.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.02 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.