XTL vs. CRAK

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XTL is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while CRAK is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XTL returned 16.27%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for CRAK. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XTL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.

Performance

XTL vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTL achieves a 51.28% return, which is significantly higher than CRAK's 29.26% return. Over the past 10 years, XTL has outperformed CRAK with an annualized return of 16.27%, while CRAK has yielded a comparatively lower 13.50% annualized return.

XTL

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: 51.28%
• 6M: 51.62%
• 1Y: 120.42%
• 3Y*: 46.01%
• 5Y*: 18.76%
• 10Y*: 16.27%

CRAK

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: 29.26%
• 6M: 26.17%
• 1Y: 55.23%
• 3Y*: 20.46%
• 5Y*: 13.12%
• 10Y*: 13.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTL vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF	51.28%	44.95%	34.89%	-1.17%	-19.18%	21.58%	22.46%	12.51%	-6.60%	0.56%
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	29.26%	39.11%	-15.05%	13.73%	19.10%	10.90%	-11.22%	9.15%	-10.46%	49.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XTL and CRAK is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015	0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between XTL and CRAK has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XTL vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XTL	CRAK
Technology	62.7%	-
Communication Services	35.0%	-
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	1.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	98.8%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	4.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XTL vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTL

XTL Risk / Return Rank: 95
XTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
XTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
XTL Omega Ratio Rank: 93
XTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
XTL Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CRAK

CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 92
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTL vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XTL	CRAK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.88	2.98	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.26	3.91	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.50	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.95	6.49	+1.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	33.56	17.24	+16.32

XTL vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTL Sharpe Ratio is 3.88, which is higher than the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTL and CRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XTL vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTL drawdown since its inception was -37.01%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTL and CRAK.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTL	CRAK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.01%	-58.80%	+21.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.70%	-8.57%	-6.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.79%	-35.61%	+12.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.01%	-35.61%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.01%	-58.80%	+21.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.72%	-6.68%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.76%	-12.48%	+2.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	3.22%	+0.26%

Volatility

XTL vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 5.81%. This indicates that XTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTL	CRAK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.43%	5.81%	+5.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.28%	14.72%	+9.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.13%	18.66%	+11.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.34%	20.67%	+4.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.66%	22.17%	+1.49%

XTL vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

XTL vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than CRAK's 1.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	1.56%	2.02%	5.60%	3.65%	3.08%	2.40%	2.64%	1.49%	2.42%	1.66%	3.42%	0.47%
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF	0.86%	1.05%	0.62%	0.80%	0.74%	1.25%	0.88%	0.92%	1.90%	2.08%	1.11%	1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTL and CRAK in my portfolio?

XTL and CRAK have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XTL or CRAK?

XTL has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to CRAK (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTL dropped -37.01% vs CRAK's -58.80%.

Which ETF is better, XTL or CRAK?

On 10-year performance, XTL leads with 16.27% vs 13.50% for CRAK. On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XTL or CRAK?

Over the 10-year period, XTL has performed better with a 16.27% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTL or CRAK?

XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for CRAK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTL or CRAK?

CRAK has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.86% for XTL.

What is the main difference between XTL and CRAK?

XTL is categorized as Communications Equities, while CRAK is Energy Equities. XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTL and 0.62% for CRAK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 2.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.