XTJL vs. MULL
XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XTJL returned 15.64% vs 6074.28% for MULL. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XTJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
XTJL vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTJL achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 15.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 216.81%
- YTD
- 936.86%
- 6M
- 1,369.93%
- 1Y
- 6,074.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 5.36% | 15.42% | 0.00% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 936.86% | 558.51% | -40.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTJL and MULL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | 0.51 |
The correlation between XTJL and MULL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
XTJL vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTJL
MULL
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XTJL
MULL
Financial Services
XTJL
MULL
-
Communication Services
XTJL
MULL
-
Consumer Cyclical
XTJL
MULL
-
Healthcare
XTJL
MULL
-
Industrials
XTJL
MULL
-
Consumer Defensive
XTJL
MULL
-
Energy
XTJL
MULL
-
Utilities
XTJL
MULL
-
Real Estate
XTJL
MULL
-
Basic Materials
XTJL
MULL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTJL vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
XTJL
MULL
XTJL vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTJL | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -44.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.89 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 116.34 | -113.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.37 | 390.40 | -373.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTJL | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 46.71 | -44.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 7.45 | -6.81 |
Drawdowns
XTJL vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTJL drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJL and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTJL | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.24% | -72.29% | +49.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.12% | -53.09% | +47.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -20.62% | +16.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 15.79% | -14.89% |
Volatility
XTJL vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) is 0.33%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that XTJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTJL | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | 55.41% | -55.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.72% | 105.59% | -99.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.43% | 132.38% | -124.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 136.22% | -121.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 136.22% | -121.00% |
XTJL vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTJL vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.04% | 0.39% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTJL and MULL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to XTJL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJL dropped -23.24% vs MULL's -72.29%.
On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs 15.64% for XTJL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs 15.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTJL and 1.50% for MULL.
MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTJL and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer