PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTJL vs. IFED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTJL vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTJL achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's -3.52% return.


XTJL

1D
0.00%
1M
1.16%
YTD
5.36%
6M
6.38%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*

IFED

1D
-1.24%
1M
4.85%
YTD
-3.52%
6M
-3.51%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTJL vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
5.36%15.42%14.43%25.72%-15.66%4.46%
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
-3.52%15.02%23.04%20.78%-1.46%8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between XTJL and IFED is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021

0.79

The correlation between XTJL and IFED shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTJL vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTJL vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTJLIFEDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.04

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

0.14

+2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.37

0.34

+17.02

XTJL vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTJL Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTJL and IFED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTJLIFEDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

0.12

+2.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.65

0.00

Drawdowns

XTJL vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTJL drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, roughly equal to the maximum IFED drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJL and IFED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTJLIFEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.24%

-22.36%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.12%

-14.65%

+9.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

-22.36%

+5.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.50%

+5.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-5.84%

+1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

5.75%

-4.85%

Volatility

XTJL vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) is 0.33%, while ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that XTJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTJLIFEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

4.50%

-4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.72%

12.86%

-7.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.43%

16.21%

-8.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

19.88%

-4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.22%

19.88%

-4.66%

XTJL vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTJL vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTJL nor IFED has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XTJL and IFED have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFED has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to XTJL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJL dropped -23.24% vs IFED's -22.36%.

On 3-year performance, IFED leads with 16.71% vs 14.68% for XTJL. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IFED has performed better with a 16.71% return vs 14.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTJL.

XTJL and IFED have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTJL and 0.45% for IFED.

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTJL and IFED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer