XTJL vs. IBIC
XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XTJL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. XTJL is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, XTJL returned 15.64% vs 4.54% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. XTJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
XTJL vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTJL achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 15.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 5.36% | 15.42% | 14.43% | 6.74% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.37% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTJL and IBIC is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023 | -0.07 |
The correlation between XTJL and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTJL vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
XTJL
IBIC
XTJL vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTJL | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 2.24 | -0.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 17.27 | -14.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.37 | 67.45 | -50.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTJL | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 5.05 | -2.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 3.49 | -2.84 |
Drawdowns
XTJL vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTJL drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJL and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTJL | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.24% | -0.90% | -22.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.12% | -0.26% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -0.10% | -3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.07% | +0.83% |
Volatility
XTJL vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) have volatilities of 0.33% and 0.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTJL | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.33% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.72% | 0.67% | +5.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.43% | 0.90% | +6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 1.58% | +13.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 1.58% | +13.64% |
XTJL vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTJL vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTJL and IBIC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIC has higher volatility (0.33%) compared to XTJL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJL dropped -23.24% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, XTJL leads with 15.64% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 15.64% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTJL.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.
XTJL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTJL and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTJL and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer