PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTJL vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTJL vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTJL achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 19.14% return.


XTJL

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.45%
YTD
5.60%
6M
5.32%
1Y
14.52%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
10Y*

FAAR

1D
-0.91%
1M
-5.21%
YTD
19.14%
6M
18.06%
1Y
28.33%
3Y*
10.57%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
4.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTJL vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
5.60%15.42%14.43%25.72%-15.66%7.81%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
19.14%8.07%5.97%-5.63%10.15%0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between XTJL and FAAR is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTJL vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTJL vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTJLFAARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.37

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

4.52

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.13

15.18

+0.95

XTJL vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTJL Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTJL and FAAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTJL vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTJL drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJL and FAAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTJLFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.24%

-18.03%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.12%

-6.29%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

-11.54%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-6.29%

+6.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-7.82%

+3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.87%

-0.97%

Volatility

XTJL vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) is 0.36%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that XTJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTJLFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

2.55%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.65%

9.68%

-4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.35%

13.38%

-6.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.14%

12.96%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

11.54%

+3.60%

XTJL vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTJL vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.66%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTJL and FAAR have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAAR has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to XTJL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJL dropped -23.24% vs FAAR's -18.03%.

On 3-year performance, XTJL leads with 14.41% vs 10.57% for FAAR. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 14.41% return vs 10.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.66%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.

XTJL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTJL and 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTJL and FAAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer