XTJA vs. XUSP
XTJA (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January) and XUSP (Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTJA returned 14.92%/yr vs 25.24%/yr for XUSP. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
XTJA vs. XUSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTJA achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than XUSP's 12.67% return.
XTJA
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 19.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XUSP
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 12.67%
- 6M
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 33.74%
- 3Y*
- 25.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJA vs. XUSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTJA Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January | 7.16% | 13.86% | 15.25% | 22.33% | -9.19% |
XUSP Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF | 12.67% | 18.27% | 30.60% | 26.46% | -9.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTJA and XUSP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between XTJA and XUSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
XTJA vs. XUSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTJA
XUSP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XTJA
XUSP
Financial Services
XTJA
XUSP
Communication Services
XTJA
XUSP
Consumer Cyclical
XTJA
XUSP
Healthcare
XTJA
XUSP
Industrials
XTJA
XUSP
Consumer Defensive
XTJA
XUSP
Energy
XTJA
XUSP
Utilities
XTJA
XUSP
Real Estate
XTJA
XUSP
Basic Materials
XTJA
XUSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTJA vs. XUSP — Risk / Return Rank
XTJA
XUSP
XTJA vs. XUSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January (XTJA) and Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTJA | XUSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.28 | 2.13 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.26 | 2.87 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.37 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 2.80 | -0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.10 | 11.82 | +2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTJA | XUSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.13 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.04 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
XTJA vs. XUSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTJA drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, which is greater than XUSP's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJA and XUSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTJA | XUSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.17% | -22.59% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -12.13% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.94% | -22.59% | +4.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.86% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.26% | -4.42% | -1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 2.86% | -1.51% |
Volatility
XTJA vs. XUSP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January (XTJA) is 1.32%, while Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that XTJA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTJA | XUSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 4.13% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 11.89% | -4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.41% | 15.90% | -7.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 19.21% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 19.21% | -3.14% |
XTJA vs. XUSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XTJA and XUSP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
XTJA vs. XUSP - Dividend Comparison
Neither XTJA nor XUSP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, XTJA and XUSP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XUSP has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to XTJA (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJA dropped -26.17% vs XUSP's -22.59%.
On 3-year performance, XUSP leads with 25.24% vs 14.92% for XTJA. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, XTJA has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XUSP has performed better with a 25.24% return vs 14.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTJA and XUSP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
XTJA and XUSP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
XTJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTJA and XUSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer