XTJA vs. QTAP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XTJA (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - XTJA is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while QTAP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTJA returned 14.16%/yr vs 19.78%/yr for QTAP. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

XTJA vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January (XTJA) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTJA achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 12.83% return.

XTJA

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 6.57%
• 6M: 6.64%
• 1Y: 17.13%
• 3Y*: 14.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTAP

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: 12.83%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 22.41%
• 3Y*: 19.78%
• 5Y*: 12.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTJA vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XTJA Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January	6.57%	13.86%	15.25%	22.33%	-20.72%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	12.83%	19.36%	17.34%	43.32%	-25.87%

Correlation

The correlation between XTJA and QTAP is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2022	0.86

The correlation between XTJA and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XTJA vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTJA

XTJA Risk / Return Rank: 70
XTJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
XTJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
XTJA Omega Ratio Rank: 83
XTJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
XTJA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTJA vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January (XTJA) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XTJA	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	3.70	-1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	6.02	-3.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.94	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.26	9.04	-6.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.57	52.85	-40.28

XTJA vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTJA Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTJA and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XTJA vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTJA drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, smaller than the maximum QTAP drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJA and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTJA	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.17%	-29.44%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.62%	-2.49%	-5.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.94%	-13.03%	-4.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-1.70%	+0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	-4.99%	-1.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.37%	0.43%	+0.94%

Volatility

XTJA vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January (XTJA) is 2.28%, while Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that XTJA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTJA	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.28%	3.03%	-0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.61%	4.94%	+2.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.46%	6.12%	+2.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.00%	18.92%	-2.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.00%	18.72%	-2.72%

XTJA vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XTJA and QTAP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

XTJA vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTJA nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTJA and QTAP in my portfolio?

XTJA and QTAP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XTJA or QTAP?

QTAP has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to XTJA (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJA dropped -26.17% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, XTJA or QTAP?

On 3-year performance, QTAP leads with 19.78% vs 14.16% for XTJA. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, XTJA has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XTJA or QTAP?

Over the 3-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 19.78% return vs 14.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTJA or QTAP?

XTJA and QTAP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTJA or QTAP?

XTJA and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XTJA and QTAP?

XTJA is categorized as Options Trading, while QTAP is Leveraged Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.