PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTJA vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTJA vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January (XTJA) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTJA achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.


XTJA

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.70%
YTD
7.16%
6M
7.78%
1Y
19.06%
3Y*
14.92%
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTJA vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XTJA
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January
7.16%13.86%15.25%22.33%-20.72%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%31.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XTJA and DBE is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2022

0.02

The correlation between XTJA and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTJA vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTJA
XTJA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XTJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJA Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTJA vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January (XTJA) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTJADBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.40

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

5.89

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.10

11.53

+2.57

XTJA vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTJA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTJA and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTJADBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.43

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.09

+0.36

Drawdowns

XTJA vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTJA drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJA and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTJADBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.17%

-86.69%

+60.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-14.41%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.94%

-23.89%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-30.27%

+30.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-57.31%

+51.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

7.35%

-6.00%

Volatility

XTJA vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January (XTJA) is 1.32%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that XTJA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTJADBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

12.95%

-11.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.29%

30.86%

-23.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.41%

34.97%

-26.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

29.39%

-13.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.07%

28.33%

-12.26%

XTJA vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTJA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTJA vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

XTJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
XTJA
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTJA and DBE have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to XTJA (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJA dropped -26.17% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 3-year performance, DBE leads with 23.42% vs 14.92% for XTJA. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, XTJA has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBE has performed better with a 23.42% return vs 14.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTJA.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for XTJA.

XTJA is categorized as Options Trading, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTJA and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTJA and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer