PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTJA vs. FFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTJA vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January (XTJA) and CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTJA achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly higher than FFTY's 6.26% return.


XTJA

1D
0.52%
1M
1.06%
6M
7.73%
YTD
8.75%
1Y
16.25%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.37%

FFTY

1D
-0.91%
1M
-9.03%
6M
3.47%
YTD
6.26%
1Y
13.28%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
-2.78%
10Y*
5.57%
ALL TIME*
4.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$863.41K$1.19M$1.59M
$12.92K$17.73K$76.25K

XTJA vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XTJA
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January
8.75%13.86%15.25%22.33%-20.72%
FFTY
CapForce IBD 50 ETF
6.26%23.38%18.36%12.40%-51.08%

Correlation

The correlation between XTJA and FFTY is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2022

0.68

The correlation between XTJA and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTJA vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XTJA
XTJA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XTJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJA Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FFTY
FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XTJA vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January (XTJA) and CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTJAFFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.07

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

0.41

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

1.00

+10.01

XTJA vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTJA Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the FFTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTJA and FFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTJA vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTJA drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJA and FFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTJAFFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.17%

-59.46%

+33.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-23.29%

+15.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.94%

-29.60%

+11.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-25.10%

+25.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.05%

-22.32%

+16.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

9.51%

-8.13%

Volatility

XTJA vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January (XTJA) is 1.98%, while CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 8.45%. This indicates that XTJA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTJAFFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

8.45%

-6.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

29.16%

-21.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.53%

36.53%

-28.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.84%

29.75%

-13.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.84%

27.79%

-11.95%

XTJA vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTJA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTJA vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

XTJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTY
CapForce IBD 50 ETF
1.27%1.35%0.91%0.65%2.75%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%
XTJA
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTJA and FFTY have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFTY has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to XTJA (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJA dropped -26.17% vs FFTY's -59.46%.

On 3-year performance, XTJA leads with 14.06% vs 13.48% for FFTY. On fees, XTJA is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJA has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XTJA has performed better with a 14.06% return vs 13.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJA is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for XTJA.

XTJA is categorized as Options Trading, while FFTY is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and CapForce. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTJA and 0.80% for FFTY.

XTJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTJA and FFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer