PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTIP.DE vs. XESC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTIP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XTIP.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTIP.DE achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than XESC.DE's 7.20% return.


XTIP.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.81%
YTD
2.69%
6M
1.65%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
1.04%
5Y*
10Y*

XESC.DE

1D
0.76%
1M
4.61%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.63%
1Y
15.79%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTIP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XTIP.DE
Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C
2.69%-5.01%7.81%0.02%-6.46%
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
7.20%22.24%11.06%22.50%10.14%

Correlation

The correlation between XTIP.DE and XESC.DE is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTIP.DE vs. XESC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTIP.DE
XTIP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XTIP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTIP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTIP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XTIP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTIP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XESC.DE
XESC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTIP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XTIP.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTIP.DEXESC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.18

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

1.45

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.83

4.94

-3.11

XTIP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTIP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTIP.DE and XESC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTIP.DEXESC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

0.98

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.32

-0.38

Drawdowns

XTIP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTIP.DE drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, smaller than the maximum XESC.DE drawdown of -45.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTIP.DE and XESC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTIP.DEXESC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.79%

-45.38%

+34.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-10.88%

+7.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.79%

-16.53%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.92%

-0.53%

-5.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-8.39%

+2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

3.19%

-1.65%

Volatility

XTIP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XTIP.DE) is 1.05%, while Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that XTIP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XESC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTIP.DEXESC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

4.90%

-3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.07%

13.02%

-8.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.00%

16.01%

-10.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.60%

17.54%

-9.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.60%

18.27%

-10.67%

XTIP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTIP.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XESC.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XTIP.DE vs. XESC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTIP.DE nor XESC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.19%
XTIP.DE
Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTIP.DE and XESC.DE have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XTIP.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XTIP.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XESC.DE.

XTIP.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while XESC.DE is Europe Equities. XTIP.DE tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XTIP.DE and 0.09% for XESC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTIP.DE and XESC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer