XTEN vs. VGIT
XTEN (BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and VGIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - XTEN tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury 10 Year Target Duration Index while VGIT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTEN returned 1.73%/yr vs 3.40%/yr for VGIT. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XTEN charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGIT.
Performance
XTEN vs. VGIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTEN achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly lower than VGIT's -0.46% return.
XTEN
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGIT
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 3.54%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
XTEN vs. VGIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTEN BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | -0.54% | 7.37% | -2.15% | 4.00% | -2.94% |
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | -0.46% | 7.34% | 1.39% | 4.28% | -0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTEN and VGIT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between XTEN and VGIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTEN vs. VGIT — Risk / Return Rank
XTEN
VGIT
XTEN vs. VGIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTEN | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.18 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.25 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.59 | 3.75 | -1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTEN | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 1.05 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.49 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
XTEN vs. VGIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.86%, smaller than the maximum VGIT drawdown of -16.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTEN and VGIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTEN | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -16.05% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.42% | -2.83% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.15% | -4.34% | -6.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.51% | -2.39% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -3.52% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 0.94% | +0.92% |
Volatility
XTEN vs. VGIT - Volatility Comparison
BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) at 1.05%. This indicates that XTEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTEN | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 1.05% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.41% | 2.33% | +2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.41% | 3.38% | +3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.56% | 5.38% | +4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.56% | 4.50% | +5.06% |
XTEN vs. VGIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTEN has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VGIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XTEN vs. VGIT - Dividend Comparison
XTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than VGIT's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | 3.87% | 3.79% | 3.67% | 2.73% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 2.23% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.67% | 1.69% | 1.69% |
XTEN BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 4.40% | 4.05% | 4.21% | 3.71% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, XTEN and VGIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XTEN has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to VGIT (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTEN dropped -13.86% vs VGIT's -16.05%.
On 3-year performance, VGIT leads with 3.40% vs 1.73% for XTEN. On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VGIT has performed better with a 3.40% return vs 1.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for XTEN.
XTEN has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 3.87% for VGIT.
XTEN tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 10 Year Target Duration Index, while VGIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XTEN and 0.03% for VGIT.
VGIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTEN and VGIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer