PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTEN vs. BNDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XTEN vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XTEN vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XTEN
Bondbloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
-0.11%7.37%-2.15%4.00%-2.94%
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.22%-8.17%-6.65%4.02%-4.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTEN achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 3.22% return.


XTEN

1D
0.17%
1M
-3.09%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
0.41%
1Y
2.68%
3Y*
1.32%
5Y*
10Y*

BNDD

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.24%
YTD
3.22%
6M
-0.19%
1Y
-5.11%
3Y*
-4.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XTEN vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTEN has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDD's 1.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XTEN vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTEN
XTEN Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDD
BNDD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BNDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDD Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTEN vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTENBNDDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.38

-0.41

+0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.57

-0.48

+1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.94

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

-0.37

+0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.45

-0.56

+2.02

XTEN vs. BNDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the BNDD Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTEN and BNDD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTENBNDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

-0.41

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

-0.35

+0.52

Correlation

The correlation between XTEN and BNDD is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XTEN vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison

XTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than BNDD's 3.64% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
XTEN
Bondbloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.22%4.05%4.21%3.71%1.04%0.00%
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.64%3.82%3.85%4.30%43.17%1.04%

Drawdowns

XTEN vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.86%, smaller than the maximum BNDD drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTEN and BNDD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XTENBNDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-30.87%

+17.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.27%

-10.93%

+5.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-27.28%

+24.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-19.03%

+14.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

7.26%

-5.10%

Volatility

XTEN vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) is 2.54%, while Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that XTEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XTENBNDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

3.52%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.29%

8.09%

-3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.15%

12.44%

-5.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.70%

13.55%

-3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.70%

13.55%

-3.85%