PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTAP vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTAP vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTAP achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.


XTAP

1D
-0.56%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
10.29%
6M
10.43%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*

LINT

1D
-12.86%
1M
11.99%
YTD
744.89%
6M
773.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTAP vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XTAP and LINT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.44

XTAP vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XTAP
LINT

Technology

35.7%
100.0%

Financial Services

11.6%

-

Communication Services

11.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

XTAP
35.7%
LINT
100.0%

Financial Services

XTAP
11.6%
LINT

-

Communication Services

XTAP
11.3%
LINT

-

Consumer Cyclical

XTAP
10.2%
LINT

-

Healthcare

XTAP
8.5%
LINT

-

Industrials

XTAP
8.3%
LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

XTAP
4.9%
LINT

-

Energy

XTAP
3.5%
LINT

-

Utilities

XTAP
2.4%
LINT

-

Real Estate

XTAP
1.9%
LINT

-

Basic Materials

XTAP
1.8%
LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTAP vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTAP
XTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTAP vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTAPLINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

62.48

XTAP vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTAP vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTAP drawdown since its inception was -22.13%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTAP and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTAPLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.13%

-49.54%

+27.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-12.86%

+11.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-20.48%

+17.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

Volatility

XTAP vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTAPLINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.83%

168.83%

-164.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

168.83%

-154.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.36%

168.83%

-154.47%

XTAP vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTAP vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

XTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XTAP and LINT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for XTAP.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTAP and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTAP and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer