PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XT01.DE vs. XDWD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XT01.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XT01.DE achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly lower than XDWD.DE's 10.91% return.


XT01.DE

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.98%
YTD
2.61%
6M
2.04%
1Y
2.13%
3Y*
1.88%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*

XDWD.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.72%
YTD
10.91%
6M
11.37%
1Y
23.85%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XT01.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XT01.DE
Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C
2.61%-7.30%11.24%1.44%7.11%8.43%-3.76%
XDWD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C
10.91%7.85%25.98%20.18%-13.67%32.74%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between XT01.DE and XDWD.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2020

0.03

The correlation between XT01.DE and XDWD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XT01.DE vs. XDWD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XT01.DE
XT01.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XT01.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT01.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT01.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XT01.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT01.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWD.DE
XDWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XDWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XT01.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XT01.DEXDWD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.40

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

3.63

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.33

14.44

-13.11

XT01.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XT01.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the XDWD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XT01.DE and XDWD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XT01.DEXDWD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

2.14

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.90

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.78

-0.34

Drawdowns

XT01.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XT01.DE drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum XDWD.DE drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT01.DE and XDWD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XT01.DEXDWD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-33.55%

+21.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.40%

-6.54%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.68%

-21.64%

+9.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

-21.64%

+9.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.19%

-0.33%

-6.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-4.55%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.65%

-0.05%

Volatility

XT01.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.DE) is 1.25%, while Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that XT01.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XT01.DEXDWD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

2.60%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.02%

7.77%

-3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.04%

11.12%

-5.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.44%

14.13%

-6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.26%

15.16%

-7.90%

XT01.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XT01.DE has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWD.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XT01.DE vs. XDWD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XT01.DE nor XDWD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XT01.DE and XDWD.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XT01.DE is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XT01.DE is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XDWD.DE.

XT01.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while XDWD.DE is Global Equities. XT01.DE tracks FTSE US Treasury Short Duration Index, while XDWD.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XT01.DE and 0.19% for XDWD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XT01.DE and XDWD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer