XDWD.DE vs. EUNL.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE).
XDWD.DE and EUNL.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDWD.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World. It was launched on Jul 22, 2014. EUNL.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. Both XDWD.DE and EUNL.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDWD.DE or EUNL.DE.
Key characteristics
| XDWD.DE | EUNL.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 24.43% | 24.43% |
| 1Y Return | 32.46% | 32.43% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.83% | 9.84% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.07% | 13.08% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.86% | 11.79% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.86 | 2.86 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.83 | 3.83 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.80 | 3.80 |
| Martin Ratio | 18.38 | 18.29 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.69% | 1.69% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.78% | 10.78% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.55% | -33.63% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWD.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XDWD.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with XDWD.DE at 24.43% and EUNL.DE at 24.43%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDWD.DE having a 11.86% annualized return and EUNL.DE not far behind at 11.79%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDWD.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWD.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDWD.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDWD.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWD.DE nor EUNL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWD.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.04% |
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XDWD.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWD.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.55%, roughly equal to the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWD.DE and EUNL.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDWD.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) have volatilities of 3.00% and 3.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.