XT01.DE vs. MDBA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE).
XT01.DE and MDBA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XT01.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Sep 3, 2020. MDBA.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped. It was launched on Nov 8, 2018. Both XT01.DE and MDBA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XT01.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XT01.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XT01.DE Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 2.20% | -7.30% | 11.24% | 1.44% | 7.11% | 8.43% | -3.76% |
MDBA.DE UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 1.36% | -5.19% | 8.65% | 0.89% | -1.84% | 6.67% | -3.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XT01.DE achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly higher than MDBA.DE's 1.36% return.
XT01.DE
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- -3.14%
- 3Y*
- 2.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- —
MDBA.DE
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- -3.20%
- 3Y*
- 1.54%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XT01.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XT01.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MDBA.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XT01.DE vs. MDBA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XT01.DE
MDBA.DE
XT01.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XT01.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | -0.47 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | -0.59 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.93 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | -0.39 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | -0.65 | +0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XT01.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | -0.47 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.18 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.25 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between XT01.DE and MDBA.DE is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XT01.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XT01.DE nor MDBA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XT01.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XT01.DE drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, roughly equal to the maximum MDBA.DE drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT01.DE and MDBA.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XT01.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.68% | -12.17% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -6.91% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.68% | -12.02% | +0.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.56% | -5.99% | -1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -5.54% | +0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 4.07% | +0.21% |
Volatility
XT01.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) at 1.84%. This indicates that XT01.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDBA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XT01.DE | MDBA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.94% | 1.84% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.02% | 3.80% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.15% | 6.76% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.45% | 7.29% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.32% | 7.09% | +0.23% |