XT01.DE vs. VUDP.F
XT01.DE (Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C) and VUDP.F (Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing) are both Government Bonds funds - XT01.DE tracks the FTSE US Treasury Short Duration Index while VUDP.F tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index Hedged in EUR. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.49, they often move in opposite directions. XT01.DE charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VUDP.F.
Performance
XT01.DE vs. VUDP.F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XT01.DE achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly higher than VUDP.F's -1.75% return.
XT01.DE
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 2.13%
- 3Y*
- 1.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- —
VUDP.F
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- -1.75%
- 6M
- -1.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XT01.DE vs. VUDP.F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XT01.DE Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C | 2.61% | -1.27% |
VUDP.F Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing | -1.75% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XT01.DE and VUDP.F is -0.49, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | -0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XT01.DE vs. VUDP.F — Risk / Return Rank
XT01.DE
VUDP.F
XT01.DE vs. VUDP.F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Treasuries Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XT01.DE) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing (VUDP.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XT01.DE | VUDP.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XT01.DE | VUDP.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | -0.43 | +0.87 |
Drawdowns
XT01.DE vs. VUDP.F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XT01.DE drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, which is greater than VUDP.F's maximum drawdown of -2.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT01.DE and VUDP.F.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XT01.DE | VUDP.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.68% | -2.16% | -9.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.19% | -1.97% | -5.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -0.82% | -4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | — | — |
Volatility
XT01.DE vs. VUDP.F - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XT01.DE | VUDP.F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.04% | 2.34% | +3.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.44% | 2.34% | +5.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 2.34% | +4.92% |
XT01.DE vs. VUDP.F - Expense Ratio Comparison
XT01.DE has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VUDP.F's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XT01.DE vs. VUDP.F - Dividend Comparison
Neither XT01.DE nor VUDP.F has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XT01.DE and VUDP.F have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XT01.DE is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XT01.DE is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VUDP.F.
XT01.DE tracks FTSE US Treasury Short Duration Index, while VUDP.F tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index Hedged in EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XT01.DE and 0.10% for VUDP.F.
Find the right allocation for XT01.DE and VUDP.F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer