VUDP.F vs. SNA2.DE
VUDP.F (Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing) and SNA2.DE (iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both Government Bonds funds - VUDP.F tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index Hedged in EUR while SNA2.DE tracks the ICE US Treasury Core Bond. Both are passively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VUDP.F charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SNA2.DE.
Performance
VUDP.F vs. SNA2.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUDP.F achieves a -1.75% return, which is significantly lower than SNA2.DE's 0.82% return.
VUDP.F
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- -1.75%
- 6M
- -1.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNA2.DE
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 1.09%
- 3Y*
- -0.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- —
VUDP.F vs. SNA2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VUDP.F Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing | -1.75% | 1.21% |
SNA2.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist | 0.82% | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUDP.F and SNA2.DE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUDP.F vs. SNA2.DE — Risk / Return Rank
VUDP.F
SNA2.DE
VUDP.F vs. SNA2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing (VUDP.F) and iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (SNA2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUDP.F | SNA2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | -0.12 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
VUDP.F vs. SNA2.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUDP.F drawdown since its inception was -2.16%, smaller than the maximum SNA2.DE drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUDP.F and SNA2.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUDP.F | SNA2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.16% | -17.70% | +15.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -14.15% | +12.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.82% | -11.16% | +10.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.69% | — |
Volatility
VUDP.F vs. SNA2.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUDP.F | SNA2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34% | 5.49% | -3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.34% | 8.06% | -5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.34% | 7.95% | -5.61% |
VUDP.F vs. SNA2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUDP.F has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SNA2.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUDP.F vs. SNA2.DE - Dividend Comparison
VUDP.F has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SNA2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNA2.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist | 3.50% | 3.74% | 3.48% | 3.07% | 1.40% | 0.72% | 1.32% |
VUDP.F Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUDP.F and SNA2.DE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SNA2.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNA2.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VUDP.F.
VUDP.F tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index Hedged in EUR, while SNA2.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VUDP.F and 0.07% for SNA2.DE.
Find the right allocation for VUDP.F and SNA2.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer