XT vs. TDV
XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) and TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net) while TDV tracks the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XT returned 8.42%/yr vs 13.94%/yr for TDV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XT charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for TDV.
Performance
XT vs. TDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a 20.20% return, which is significantly lower than TDV's 23.09% return.
XT
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 20.20%
- 6M
- 20.54%
- 1Y
- 45.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
TDV
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 10.03%
- YTD
- 23.09%
- 6M
- 21.07%
- 1Y
- 36.07%
- 3Y*
- 20.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.94%
- 10Y*
- —
XT vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 20.20% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 35.10% | 5.85% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 23.09% | 16.05% | 9.72% | 27.29% | -15.94% | 28.29% | 29.00% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between XT and TDV is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between XT and TDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
XT vs. TDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XT
TDV
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
XT
TDV
Healthcare
XT
TDV
-
Industrials
XT
TDV
Consumer Cyclical
XT
TDV
-
Communication Services
XT
TDV
-
Utilities
XT
TDV
-
Financial Services
XT
TDV
Basic Materials
XT
TDV
-
Energy
XT
TDV
-
Real Estate
XT
TDV
-
Consumer Defensive
XT
TDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XT vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank
XT
TDV
XT vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XT | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.36 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 3.79 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.51 | 13.11 | +5.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XT | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 2.10 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.69 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.76 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
XT vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, roughly equal to the maximum TDV drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and TDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XT | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.41% | -32.78% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -9.55% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.09% | -22.51% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.41% | -25.11% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -0.42% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -5.36% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.76% | -0.27% |
Volatility
XT vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) have volatilities of 4.85% and 5.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XT | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 5.07% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.94% | 12.72% | -0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.99% | 17.29% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 20.45% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 23.20% | -3.12% |
XT vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XT has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than TDV's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
XT vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison
XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than TDV's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 0.93% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 6.61% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XT and TDV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDV has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XT dropped -34.41% vs TDV's -32.78%.
On 5-year performance, TDV leads with 13.94% vs 8.42% for XT. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TDV has performed better with a 13.94% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for TDV.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.93% for TDV.
XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for XT and 0.66% for TDV.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XT and TDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer