XT vs. STHH
XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds - XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net) while STHH tracks the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XT returned 45.88% vs 209.77% for STHH. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XT charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.
Performance
XT vs. STHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a 20.20% return, which is significantly lower than STHH's 209.56% return.
XT
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 20.20%
- 6M
- 20.54%
- 1Y
- 45.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
STHH
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 45.30%
- YTD
- 209.56%
- 6M
- 210.55%
- 1Y
- 209.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XT vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 20.20% | 35.11% |
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 209.56% | 16.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between XT and STHH is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025 | 0.66 |
The correlation between XT and STHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XT vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank
XT
STHH
XT vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XT | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.60 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 6.23 | -1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.51 | 14.15 | +4.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XT | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 4.20 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 4.44 | -3.78 |
Drawdowns
XT vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, roughly equal to the maximum STHH drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and STHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XT | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.41% | -33.89% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -33.89% | +23.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | 0.00% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -10.46% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 14.90% | -12.41% |
Volatility
XT vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) is 4.85%, while STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a volatility of 20.33%. This indicates that XT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XT | STHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 20.33% | -15.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.94% | 36.77% | -24.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.99% | 50.39% | -34.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 49.44% | -28.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 49.44% | -29.36% |
XT vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XT has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
XT vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison
XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than STHH's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged | 0.55% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 6.61% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XT and STHH have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STHH has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XT dropped -34.41% vs STHH's -33.89%.
On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 209.77% vs 45.88% for XT. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 209.77% return vs 45.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.55% for STHH.
XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for XT and 0.19% for STHH.
STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XT and STHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer