XT vs. MTUM
XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XT returned 14.27%/yr vs 16.34%/yr for MTUM. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XT charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
XT vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 25.95% return. Over the past 10 years, XT has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 14.27%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.
XT
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- YTD
- 16.76%
- 1Y
- 33.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
MTUM
- 1D
- -2.22%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- 6M
- 21.75%
- YTD
- 25.95%
- 1Y
- 34.12%
- 3Y*
- 30.38%
- 5Y*
- 14.17%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
XT vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 16.76% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 35.10% | 30.74% | -4.93% | 33.71% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 25.95% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between XT and MTUM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015 | 0.79 |
The correlation between XT and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
XT vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XT
MTUM
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Technology
XT
MTUM
Healthcare
XT
MTUM
Industrials
XT
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
XT
MTUM
Utilities
XT
MTUM
Communication Services
XT
MTUM
Financial Services
XT
MTUM
Basic Materials
XT
MTUM
Energy
XT
MTUM
Real Estate
XT
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
XT
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XT vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
XT
MTUM
XT vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XT | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.27 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 2.97 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.61 | 10.23 | +2.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XT vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XT | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.41% | -34.08% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -11.54% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.09% | -20.99% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.41% | -32.28% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.41% | -34.08% | -0.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -8.86% | +5.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -6.19% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 3.34% | -0.65% |
Volatility
XT vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) is 6.67%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that XT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XT | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 13.18% | -6.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.11% | 21.54% | -7.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 23.81% | -6.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 21.54% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 21.52% | -1.43% |
XT vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XT has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XT vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than MTUM's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.59% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 7.02% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XT and MTUM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to XT (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XT dropped -34.41% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 16.34% vs 14.27% for XT. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 6.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 16.34% return vs 14.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 0.59% for MTUM.
XT is categorized as Technology Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for XT and 0.15% for MTUM.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XT and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer