PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XT vs. IQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XT vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XT vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XT
iShares Exponential Technologies ETF
-2.28%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%16.43%42.78%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
1.18%30.76%31.03%41.06%-33.36%25.18%78.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 1.18% return.


XT

1D
3.61%
1M
-6.01%
YTD
-2.28%
6M
2.00%
1Y
27.90%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
12.76%

IQM

1D
6.12%
1M
-5.61%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.33%
1Y
55.72%
3Y*
26.13%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XT vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XT vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

IQM
IQM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XT vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTIQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

1.68

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

2.29

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.72

-1.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.06

11.65

-2.59

XT vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XT Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XT and IQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTIQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.68

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.52

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.77

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between XT and IQM is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XT vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XT
iShares Exponential Technologies ETF
8.13%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XT vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and IQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XTIQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.41%

-44.91%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.11%

-14.71%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-44.91%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.22%

-8.68%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-12.55%

+5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

4.70%

-1.71%

Volatility

XT vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) is 7.04%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that XT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XTIQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.04%

12.90%

-5.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.38%

23.48%

-11.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.87%

33.37%

-12.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.68%

28.67%

-7.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.02%

30.73%

-10.71%