PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XT vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XT vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a 20.20% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, XT has outperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 14.70%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.30% annualized return.


XT

1D
-0.47%
1M
9.47%
YTD
20.20%
6M
20.54%
1Y
45.88%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
14.70%

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XT vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
20.20%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%16.43%35.10%30.74%-4.93%33.71%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XT and DGRO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2015

0.77

The correlation between XT and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XT vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XT
DGRO

Technology

43.5%
19.4%

Healthcare

23.4%
16.4%

Industrials

10.1%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
5.7%

Communication Services

5.2%
0.1%

Utilities

4.6%
6.9%

Financial Services

3.3%
21.2%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.5%

Energy

0.3%
5.6%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
11.5%

Technology

XT
43.5%
DGRO
19.4%

Healthcare

XT
23.4%
DGRO
16.4%

Industrials

XT
10.1%
DGRO
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XT
7.9%
DGRO
5.7%

Communication Services

XT
5.2%
DGRO
0.1%

Utilities

XT
4.6%
DGRO
6.9%

Financial Services

XT
3.3%
DGRO
21.2%

Basic Materials

XT
2.0%
DGRO
2.5%

Energy

XT
0.3%
DGRO
5.6%

Real Estate

XT
0.0%
DGRO

-

Consumer Defensive

XT
0.0%
DGRO
11.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XT vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XT vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.43

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

3.50

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.51

13.52

+4.99

XT vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XT Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XT and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

2.39

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.77

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.80

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.76

-0.11

Drawdowns

XT vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.41%

-35.10%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-6.47%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.09%

-14.03%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-19.31%

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

-35.10%

+0.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.28%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.41%

-3.44%

-3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

1.67%

+0.82%

Volatility

XT vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that XT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

2.21%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.94%

6.91%

+5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.99%

9.48%

+6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

13.82%

+6.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

16.62%

+3.46%

XT vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XT has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XT vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
6.61%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


XT and DGRO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XT has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XT dropped -34.41% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, XT leads with 14.70% vs 13.30% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XT has performed better with a 14.70% return vs 13.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.

XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.

XT is categorized as Technology Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for XT and 0.08% for DGRO.

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XT and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer