PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSX6.DE vs. XCMC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSX6.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (XSX6.DE) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSX6.DE achieves a 7.40% return, which is significantly lower than XCMC.DE's 28.51% return.


XSX6.DE

1D
0.59%
1M
0.87%
YTD
7.40%
6M
10.04%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
9.14%

XCMC.DE

1D
-1.20%
1M
0.63%
YTD
28.51%
6M
19.13%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
11.29%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSX6.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XSX6.DE
Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF
7.40%20.91%8.35%15.54%-10.63%1.58%
XCMC.DE
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C
28.51%-2.66%11.92%-9.34%24.84%-11.32%

Correlation

The correlation between XSX6.DE and XCMC.DE is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

0.05

The correlation between XSX6.DE and XCMC.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSX6.DE vs. XCMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSX6.DE
XSX6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XSX6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSX6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSX6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XSX6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSX6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

XCMC.DE
XCMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XCMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XCMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSX6.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (XSX6.DE) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSX6.DEXCMC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

3.72

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

8.44

-1.88

XSX6.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSX6.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the XCMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSX6.DE and XCMC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSX6.DEXCMC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.66

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.44

+0.15

Drawdowns

XSX6.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSX6.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, which is greater than XCMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSX6.DE and XCMC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSX6.DEXCMC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.05%

-22.91%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

-7.80%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

-14.82%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-3.42%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-12.68%

+7.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

3.45%

-0.95%

Volatility

XSX6.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (XSX6.DE) is 4.26%, while Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that XSX6.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSX6.DEXCMC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

4.94%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

15.31%

-4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.95%

17.48%

-4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.44%

17.33%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.61%

17.33%

-1.72%

XSX6.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSX6.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XCMC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSX6.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSX6.DE nor XCMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XSX6.DE and XCMC.DE have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCMC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSX6.DE.

XSX6.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while XCMC.DE is Commodities. XSX6.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600, while XCMC.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSX6.DE and 0.19% for XCMC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSX6.DE and XCMC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer