XSVT.DE vs. ENTR.DE
XSVT.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C) and ENTR.DE (L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Commodities funds - XSVT.DE tracks the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward while ENTR.DE tracks the Solactive Energy Transition Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XSVT.DE returned 31.27% vs 30.75% for ENTR.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSVT.DE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ENTR.DE.
Performance
XSVT.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSVT.DE achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than ENTR.DE's 6.68% return.
XSVT.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 14.01%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENTR.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- 6.68%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 30.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSVT.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XSVT.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C | 10.76% | 6.47% |
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 6.68% | 11.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSVT.DE and ENTR.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2025 | 0.66 |
The correlation between XSVT.DE and ENTR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSVT.DE vs. ENTR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XSVT.DE
ENTR.DE
XSVT.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSVT.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.33 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 3.18 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 10.08 | -5.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSVT.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSVT.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.57%, which is greater than ENTR.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVT.DE and ENTR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSVT.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.57% | -13.89% | -13.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.82% | -9.72% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.59% | -7.86% | -2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.49% | -4.89% | -9.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.22% | 3.06% | +3.16% |
Volatility
XSVT.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) have volatilities of 3.94% and 3.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSVT.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 3.87% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.00% | 14.17% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.42% | 17.01% | +11.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 16.34% | +5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 16.34% | +5.21% |
XSVT.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSVT.DE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ENTR.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSVT.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSVT.DE nor ENTR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XSVT.DE and ENTR.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSVT.DE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSVT.DE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
XSVT.DE tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward, while ENTR.DE tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XSVT.DE and 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
Find the right allocation for XSVT.DE and ENTR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer