XSVT.DE vs. EMEH.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XSVT.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C) and EMEH.DE (BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR) are both Commodities funds - XSVT.DE tracks the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward while EMEH.DE tracks the BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSVT.DE returned 16.36%/yr vs 16.63%/yr for EMEH.DE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSVT.DE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EMEH.DE.

Performance

XSVT.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XSVT.DE having a 21.63% return and EMEH.DE slightly lower at 21.33%.

XSVT.DE

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 21.63%
• 6M: 26.61%
• 1Y: 43.07%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMEH.DE

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: 21.33%
• 6M: 24.96%
• 1Y: 44.23%
• 3Y*: 16.63%
• 5Y*: 11.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSVT.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XSVT.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C	21.63%	14.36%	15.10%	-12.67%	14.63%
EMEH.DE BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR	21.33%	25.40%	6.63%	-12.26%	0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XSVT.DE and EMEH.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2022	0.86

The correlation between XSVT.DE and EMEH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XSVT.DE vs. EMEH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSVT.DE

XSVT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 70
XSVT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
XSVT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XSVT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
XSVT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
XSVT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 61

EMEH.DE

EMEH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
EMEH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EMEH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EMEH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EMEH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSVT.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XSVT.DE	EMEH.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.47	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.99	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.45	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.58	4.95	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.89	14.34	-3.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSVT.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSVT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSVT.DE and EMEH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XSVT.DE	EMEH.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	2.47	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	-0.48	+1.09

Drawdowns

XSVT.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSVT.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.57%, smaller than the maximum EMEH.DE drawdown of -92.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVT.DE and EMEH.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSVT.DE	EMEH.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.57%	-92.42%	+64.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.35%	-8.89%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.97%	-12.28%	-3.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-80.34%	+78.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.41%	-81.38%	+66.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.95%	3.08%	+0.87%

Volatility

XSVT.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XSVT.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) have volatilities of 4.33% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSVT.DE	EMEH.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	4.15%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.57%	15.95%	-0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.53%	17.83%	+0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.83%	17.50%	+1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.83%	34.16%	-15.33%

XSVT.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSVT.DE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEH.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSVT.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSVT.DE nor EMEH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSVT.DE and EMEH.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, XSVT.DE and EMEH.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XSVT.DE or EMEH.DE?

On fees, XSVT.DE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSVT.DE or EMEH.DE?

XSVT.DE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMEH.DE.

What is the main difference between XSVT.DE and EMEH.DE?

XSVT.DE tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward, while EMEH.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XSVT.DE and 0.39% for EMEH.DE.