PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSVN vs. XTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XSVN vs. XTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) and Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XSVN vs. XTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XSVN
Bondbloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
-0.14%8.18%-0.35%3.91%-1.71%
XTWO
Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
0.21%5.17%3.92%4.27%0.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSVN achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than XTWO's 0.21% return.


XSVN

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-0.14%
6M
0.49%
1Y
3.65%
3Y*
2.54%
5Y*
10Y*

XTWO

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
0.21%
6M
1.18%
1Y
3.66%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XSVN vs. XTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XSVN and XTWO have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XSVN vs. XTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSVN
XSVN Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XSVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVN Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

XTWO
XTWO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
XTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSVN vs. XTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) and Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSVNXTWODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

2.36

-1.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

3.73

-2.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.49

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

4.09

-2.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.10

14.75

-11.65

XSVN vs. XTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSVN Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the XTWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSVN and XTWO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSVNXTWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

2.36

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.77

-1.40

Correlation

The correlation between XSVN and XTWO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XSVN vs. XTWO - Dividend Comparison

XSVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, which matches XTWO's 4.09% yield.


Drawdowns

XSVN vs. XTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSVN drawdown since its inception was -9.45%, which is greater than XTWO's maximum drawdown of -1.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVN and XTWO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XSVNXTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-1.73%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-0.91%

-2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-0.58%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-0.40%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

0.25%

+1.03%

Volatility

XSVN vs. XTWO - Volatility Comparison

Bondbloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) at 0.56%. This indicates that XSVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XSVNXTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

0.56%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

0.91%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.20%

1.56%

+3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.29%

2.20%

+5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.29%

2.20%

+5.09%