PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSVN vs. SMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSVN vs. SMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSVN achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than SMBS's 0.70% return.


XSVN

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.57%
6M
-1.04%
1Y
4.22%
3Y*
2.75%
5Y*
10Y*

SMBS

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.70%
6M
0.82%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSVN vs. SMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XSVN and SMBS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2024

0.91

The correlation between XSVN and SMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSVN vs. SMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSVN
XSVN Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
XSVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVN Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVN Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SMBS
SMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSVN vs. SMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSVNSMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.30

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

2.41

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

8.21

-5.03

XSVN vs. SMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSVN Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the SMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSVN and SMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSVNSMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.64

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.18

-0.83

Drawdowns

XSVN vs. SMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSVN drawdown since its inception was -9.45%, which is greater than SMBS's maximum drawdown of -3.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVN and SMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSVNSMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-3.20%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.01%

-2.83%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-1.33%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-0.84%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

0.83%

+0.50%

Volatility

XSVN vs. SMBS - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) have volatilities of 1.54% and 1.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSVNSMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

1.55%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

3.03%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.65%

4.15%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.19%

4.86%

+2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.19%

4.86%

+2.33%

XSVN vs. SMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSVN has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SMBS's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSVN vs. SMBS - Dividend Comparison

XSVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than SMBS's 5.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SMBS
Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
5.17%4.83%0.50%0.00%0.00%
XSVN
BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.10%4.06%4.17%3.49%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XSVN and SMBS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SMBS has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to XSVN (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVN dropped -9.45% vs SMBS's -3.20%.

On 1-year performance, SMBS leads with 6.78% vs 4.22% for XSVN. On fees, SMBS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMBS has performed better with a 6.78% return vs 4.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMBS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for XSVN.

SMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.17%, compared with 4.10% for XSVN.

XSVN is categorized as Government Bonds, while SMBS is Mortgage Backed Securities. XSVN tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 7 Year Target Duration Index, while SMBS tracks Bloomberg US MBS Float Adjusted Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for XSVN and 0.03% for SMBS.

SMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSVN and SMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer