SMBS vs. HIMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMBS (Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) and HIMU (iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMBS is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund tracking the Bloomberg US MBS Float Adjusted Total Return Index, while HIMU is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by iShares. SMBS is passively managed, while HIMU is actively managed. Over the past year, SMBS returned 6.78% vs 7.39% for HIMU. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMBS charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for HIMU.

Performance

SMBS vs. HIMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) and iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMBS achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than HIMU's 2.68% return.

SMBS

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 0.70%
• 6M: 0.82%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HIMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 7.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMBS vs. HIMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMBS Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.70%	7.09%
HIMU iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF	2.68%	1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SMBS and HIMU is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025	0.49

The correlation between SMBS and HIMU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SMBS vs. HIMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMBS

SMBS Risk / Return Rank: 48
SMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
SMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
SMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 49

HIMU

HIMU Risk / Return Rank: 46
HIMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
HIMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
HIMU Omega Ratio Rank: 49
HIMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
HIMU Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMBS vs. HIMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) and iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMBS	HIMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.61	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	2.30	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.31	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	2.25	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.21	7.08	+1.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMBS vs. HIMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the HIMU Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMBS and HIMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMBS	HIMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.64	1.61	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	0.40	+0.78

Drawdowns

SMBS vs. HIMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMBS drawdown since its inception was -3.20%, smaller than the maximum HIMU drawdown of -8.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMBS and HIMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMBS	HIMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-8.01%	+4.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.83%	-3.29%	+0.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	0.00%	-1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.84%	-1.76%	+0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	1.05%	-0.22%

Volatility

SMBS vs. HIMU - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF (HIMU) at 1.26%. This indicates that SMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMBS	HIMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.55%	1.26%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.03%	3.15%	-0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.15%	4.62%	-0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.86%	7.42%	-2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.86%	7.42%	-2.56%

SMBS vs. HIMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMBS has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than HIMU's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMBS vs. HIMU - Dividend Comparison

SMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, which matches HIMU's 5.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
HIMU iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF	5.15%	4.57%	0.00%
SMBS Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	5.17%	4.83%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMBS and HIMU in my portfolio?

SMBS and HIMU have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMBS or HIMU?

SMBS has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to HIMU (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMBS dropped -3.20% vs HIMU's -8.01%.

Which ETF is better, SMBS or HIMU?

On 1-year performance, HIMU leads with 7.39% vs 6.78% for SMBS. On fees, SMBS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HIMU has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMBS or HIMU?

Over the 1-year period, HIMU has performed better with a 7.39% return vs 6.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMBS or HIMU?

SMBS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for HIMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMBS or HIMU?

SMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.17%, compared with 5.15% for HIMU.

What is the main difference between SMBS and HIMU?

SMBS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while HIMU is High Yield Muni. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SMBS and 0.42% for HIMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.