PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XSUS.TO vs. XIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XSUS.TO vs. XIC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XSUS.TO (iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF) and XIC.TO (iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSUS.TO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index, while XIC.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSUS.TO returned 14.81%/yr vs 14.60%/yr for XIC.TO. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSUS.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for XIC.TO.

Performance

XSUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSUS.TO achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly higher than XIC.TO's 10.75% return.

XSUS.TO

1D
-0.23%
1M
7.89%
YTD
12.45%
6M
8.87%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
14.81%
10Y*
—

XIC.TO

1D
-1.05%
1M
3.59%
YTD
10.75%
6M
12.90%
1Y
34.79%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XSUS.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF		12.45%9.48%32.85%21.80%-15.17%26.44%18.78%13.32%
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		10.75%31.51%21.48%11.73%-5.82%23.42%5.61%8.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XSUS.TO and XIC.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019

0.60

The correlation between XSUS.TO and XIC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XSUS.TO
XIC.TO

Technology

38.4%
6.7%

Financial Services

11.6%
34.0%

Communication Services

9.8%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
3.7%

Healthcare

8.6%
0.1%

Industrials

8.3%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
2.9%

Energy

3.5%
18.1%

Utilities

2.4%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.5%

Basic Materials

1.6%
17.2%

Technology

XSUS.TO
38.4%
XIC.TO
6.7%

Financial Services

XSUS.TO
11.6%
XIC.TO
34.0%

Communication Services

XSUS.TO
9.8%
XIC.TO
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XSUS.TO
9.5%
XIC.TO
3.7%

Healthcare

XSUS.TO
8.6%
XIC.TO
0.1%

Industrials

XSUS.TO
8.3%
XIC.TO
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

XSUS.TO
4.0%
XIC.TO
2.9%

Energy

XSUS.TO
3.5%
XIC.TO
18.1%

Utilities

XSUS.TO
2.4%
XIC.TO
2.9%

Real Estate

XSUS.TO
2.1%
XIC.TO
1.5%

Basic Materials

XSUS.TO
1.6%
XIC.TO
17.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF

iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Often compared with XSUS.TO:
XSUS.TO vs. XUSR.TOXSUS.TO vs. XEQT.TOXSUS.TO vs. XINC.TOXSUS.TO vs. DSIXSUS.TO vs. XSAB.TOXSUS.TO vs. VFV.TOXSUS.TO vs. SCHD
Often compared with XIC.TO:
XIC.TO vs. XIU.TOXIC.TO vs. VDY.TOXIC.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIC.TO vs. VCE.TOXIC.TO vs. XEF.TOXIC.TO vs. VEQT.TOXIC.TO vs. VO

Return for Risk

XSUS.TO vs. XIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XSUS.TO
XSUS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XSUS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSUS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSUS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XSUS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSUS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
XIC.TO
XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS.TO) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XSUS.TOXIC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.30
2.76

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.16
3.57

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.50

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.76

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

17.44

-8.14

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSUS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSUS.TO and XIC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XSUS.TOXIC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.76

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

1.12

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.84

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.54

+0.42

Drawdowns

XSUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.32%, smaller than the maximum XIC.TO drawdown of -48.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSUS.TO and XIC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XSUS.TOXIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.32%

-48.21%

+19.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-9.29%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.45%

-12.27%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.02%

-16.24%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-37.21%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-1.05%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-7.04%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.00%

+0.96%

Volatility

XSUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS.TO) is 2.91%, while iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that XSUS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XSUS.TOXIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

3.48%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

10.33%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

12.67%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.06%

13.13%

+1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

14.96%

+1.62%

XSUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSUS.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XIC.TO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XSUS.TO vs. XIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XSUS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than XIC.TO's 2.02% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XIC.TO
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF		2.02%2.23%2.64%2.95%3.10%2.44%3.03%3.01%3.19%2.49%2.72%3.21%
XSUS.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF		0.74%0.83%0.81%1.09%0.96%0.83%0.92%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XSUS.TO and XIC.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIC.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for XSUS.TO.

XSUS.TO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XIC.TO is Canada Equities. XSUS.TO tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index, while XIC.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XSUS.TO and 0.06% for XIC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSUS.TO and XIC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer