PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSUS.TO vs. QQCE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSUS.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS.TO) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSUS.TO achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly lower than QQCE.TO's 23.30% return.


XSUS.TO

1D
-0.23%
1M
7.89%
YTD
12.45%
6M
8.87%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
14.81%
10Y*

QQCE.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
14.10%
YTD
23.30%
6M
19.99%
1Y
45.87%
3Y*
30.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSUS.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XSUS.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF
12.45%9.48%32.85%21.80%-15.17%5.37%
QQCE.TO
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
23.30%16.43%36.67%44.13%-25.37%5.14%

Correlation

The correlation between XSUS.TO and QQCE.TO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021

0.58

Over the past year, XSUS.TO and QQCE.TO have become more correlated (0.84) than their long-term average of 0.58, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSUS.TO vs. QQCE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSUS.TO
XSUS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XSUS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSUS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSUS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XSUS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSUS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

QQCE.TO
QQCE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
QQCE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSUS.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS.TO) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSUS.TOQQCE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.50

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.50

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

10.72

-1.42

XSUS.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSUS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the QQCE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSUS.TO and QQCE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSUS.TOQQCE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.80

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.92

+0.04

Drawdowns

XSUS.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.32%, smaller than the maximum QQCE.TO drawdown of -30.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSUS.TO and QQCE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSUS.TOQQCE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.32%

-30.86%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-13.16%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.45%

-23.05%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

0.00%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-8.70%

+3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

4.29%

-1.33%

Volatility

XSUS.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS.TO) is 2.91%, while Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQCE.TO) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that XSUS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSUS.TOQQCE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

4.78%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

12.65%

-3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

16.47%

-4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.06%

20.71%

-5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

20.71%

-4.13%

XSUS.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSUS.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than QQCE.TO's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSUS.TO vs. QQCE.TO - Dividend Comparison

XSUS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than QQCE.TO's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
QQCE.TO
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
0.26%0.32%0.38%0.44%0.79%0.14%0.00%0.00%
XSUS.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF
0.74%0.83%0.81%1.09%0.96%0.83%0.92%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSUS.TO and QQCE.TO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQCE.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQCE.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for XSUS.TO.

XSUS.TO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQCE.TO is Nasdaq-100. XSUS.TO tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index, while QQCE.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XSUS.TO and 0.21% for QQCE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSUS.TO and QQCE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer