PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XSUS.TO vs. QQC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XSUS.TO vs. QQC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XSUS.TO (iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF) and QQC.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - XSUS.TO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index, while QQC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSUS.TO returned 14.81%/yr vs 21.56%/yr for QQC.TO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSUS.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQC.TO.

Performance

XSUS.TO vs. QQC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSUS.TO achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly lower than QQC.TO's 22.65% return.

XSUS.TO

1D
-0.23%
1M
7.89%
YTD
12.45%
6M
8.87%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
14.81%
10Y*
—

QQC.TO

1D
0.14%
1M
12.93%
YTD
22.65%
6M
19.07%
1Y
43.34%
3Y*
29.99%
5Y*
21.56%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSUS.TO vs. QQC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XSUS.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF		12.45%9.48%32.85%21.80%-15.17%18.28%
QQC.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged		22.65%15.38%35.73%51.73%-28.07%25.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XSUS.TO and QQC.TO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2021

0.83

The correlation between XSUS.TO and QQC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSUS.TO vs. QQC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XSUS.TO
QQC.TO

Technology

38.4%
53.8%

Financial Services

11.6%
0.2%

Communication Services

9.8%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
12.3%

Healthcare

8.6%
4.2%

Industrials

8.3%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
7.7%

Energy

3.5%
0.6%

Utilities

2.4%
1.4%

Real Estate

2.1%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.1%

Technology

XSUS.TO
38.4%
QQC.TO
53.8%

Financial Services

XSUS.TO
11.6%
QQC.TO
0.2%

Communication Services

XSUS.TO
9.8%
QQC.TO
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XSUS.TO
9.5%
QQC.TO
12.3%

Healthcare

XSUS.TO
8.6%
QQC.TO
4.2%

Industrials

XSUS.TO
8.3%
QQC.TO
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

XSUS.TO
4.0%
QQC.TO
7.7%

Energy

XSUS.TO
3.5%
QQC.TO
0.6%

Utilities

XSUS.TO
2.4%
QQC.TO
1.4%

Real Estate

XSUS.TO
2.1%
QQC.TO
0.1%

Basic Materials

XSUS.TO
1.6%
QQC.TO
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF

Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged

Often compared with XSUS.TO:
XSUS.TO vs. XUSR.TOXSUS.TO vs. XEQT.TOXSUS.TO vs. XINC.TOXSUS.TO vs. DSIXSUS.TO vs. XSAB.TOXSUS.TO vs. VFV.TOXSUS.TO vs. SCHD
Often compared with QQC.TO:
QQC.TO vs. VFV.TOQQC.TO vs. XQQ.TOQQC.TO vs. QQQQQC.TO vs. TEC.TOQQC.TO vs. HXQ.TOQQC.TO vs. QQC-F.TOQQC.TO vs. QQQM

Return for Risk

XSUS.TO vs. QQC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XSUS.TO
XSUS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XSUS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSUS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSUS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XSUS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSUS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
QQC.TO
QQC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSUS.TO vs. QQC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XSUS.TOQQC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.30
2.84

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.16
3.69

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.50

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

3.59

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

11.38

-2.08

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSUS.TO vs. QQC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSUS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the QQC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSUS.TO and QQC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XSUS.TOQQC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.84

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

1.04

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

1.02

-0.06

Drawdowns

XSUS.TO vs. QQC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.32%, smaller than the maximum QQC.TO drawdown of -31.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSUS.TO and QQC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XSUS.TOQQC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.32%

-31.81%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-12.14%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.45%

-22.59%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.02%

-31.81%

+7.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

0.00%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-8.06%

+3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.82%

-0.86%

Volatility

XSUS.TO vs. QQC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS.TO) is 2.91%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC.TO) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that XSUS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XSUS.TOQQC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

4.36%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

11.58%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

15.33%

-3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.06%

20.85%

-5.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

20.82%

-4.24%

XSUS.TO vs. QQC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSUS.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than QQC.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XSUS.TO vs. QQC.TO - Dividend Comparison

XSUS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than QQC.TO's 0.31% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
QQC.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged		0.31%0.39%0.45%0.54%0.91%0.56%0.00%0.00%
XSUS.TO
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF		0.74%0.83%0.81%1.09%0.96%0.83%0.92%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.91, XSUS.TO and QQC.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QQC.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQC.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for XSUS.TO.

XSUS.TO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQC.TO is Nasdaq-100. XSUS.TO tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index, while QQC.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XSUS.TO and 0.20% for QQC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSUS.TO and QQC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer