PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XST.TO vs. RSPN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XST.TO vs. RSPN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XST.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF) and RSPN (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XST.TO is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while RSPN is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XST.TO returned 9.62%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for RSPN. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XST.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPN.

Performance

XST.TO vs. RSPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XST.TO is traded in CAD, while RSPN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RSPN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XST.TO achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than RSPN's 10.53% return. Over the past 10 years, XST.TO has underperformed RSPN with an annualized return of 9.62%, while RSPN has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.

XST.TO

1D
0.28%
1M
1.37%
YTD
1.77%
6M
0.81%
1Y
7.32%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*
9.62%

RSPN

1D
1.13%
1M
4.06%
YTD
10.53%
6M
8.90%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
20.43%
5Y*
14.40%
10Y*
15.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XST.TO vs. RSPN - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XST.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF		1.77%16.38%19.83%6.37%8.76%20.39%3.48%12.13%1.65%6.95%
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF		10.53%8.62%27.74%19.62%-2.29%24.93%16.08%26.63%-5.87%15.38%

Correlation

The correlation between XST.TO and RSPN is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2012

0.26

The correlation between XST.TO and RSPN shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XST.TO vs. RSPN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XST.TO
RSPN

Consumer Defensive

74.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

25.1%
2.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

91.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

4.2%

Utilities

-

1.5%

Consumer Defensive

XST.TO
74.9%
RSPN

-

Consumer Cyclical

XST.TO
25.1%
RSPN
2.5%

Basic Materials

XST.TO

-

RSPN

-

Communication Services

XST.TO

-

RSPN

-

Energy

XST.TO

-

RSPN

-

Financial Services

XST.TO

-

RSPN
0.0%

Healthcare

XST.TO

-

RSPN

-

Industrials

XST.TO

-

RSPN
91.8%

Real Estate

XST.TO

-

RSPN

-

Technology

XST.TO

-

RSPN
4.2%

Utilities

XST.TO

-

RSPN
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF

Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF

Often compared with XST.TO:
XST.TO vs. VDCXST.TO vs. VOOXST.TO vs. BALTXST.TO vs. XQQ.TOXST.TO vs. XSTP.TOXST.TO vs. XCD.TOXST.TO vs. CHSCP
Often compared with RSPN:
RSPN vs. RSPRSPN vs. QQQRSPN vs. SPYRSPN vs. PKBRSPN vs. EQWLRSPN vs. IVESRSPN vs. BIS

Return for Risk

XST.TO vs. RSPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XST.TO
XST.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XST.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XST.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XST.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XST.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XST.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
RSPN
RSPN Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
RSPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPN Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPN Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XST.TO vs. RSPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XST.TORSPNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.46
1.34

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.75
1.99

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.23

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

1.89

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

6.09

-4.44

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XST.TO vs. RSPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XST.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the RSPN Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XST.TO and RSPN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XST.TORSPNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

1.34

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.89

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.83

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.98

+0.01

Drawdowns

XST.TO vs. RSPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XST.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, smaller than the maximum RSPN drawdown of -36.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XST.TO and RSPN.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XST.TORSPNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-36.58%

+13.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-10.76%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.86%

-19.56%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.86%

-20.02%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.65%

-36.58%

+13.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.39%

-1.74%

-4.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-3.81%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

3.33%

+1.11%

Volatility

XST.TO vs. RSPN - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) at 4.17%. This indicates that XST.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XST.TORSPNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.17%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

12.14%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12%

15.19%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

16.23%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.95%

18.49%

-3.54%

XST.TO vs. RSPN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XST.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPN's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XST.TO vs. RSPN - Dividend Comparison

XST.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than RSPN's 0.81% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPN
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF		0.81%0.86%0.98%1.06%1.09%0.70%0.96%1.33%1.49%1.12%1.31%1.51%
XST.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF		0.68%0.67%0.86%0.79%0.74%0.68%0.74%0.73%0.81%0.90%0.52%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

XST.TO and RSPN have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RSPN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RSPN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XST.TO.

XST.TO is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while RSPN is Industrials Equities. XST.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while RSPN tracks S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XST.TO and 0.40% for RSPN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XST.TO and RSPN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer