XSPX.L vs. SPMV.L
XSPX.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and SPMV.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both S&P 500 funds - XSPX.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while SPMV.L tracks the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Net in USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSPX.L returned 14.72%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for SPMV.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSPX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPMV.L.
Performance
XSPX.L vs. SPMV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XSPX.L is traded in GBp, while SPMV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSPX.L achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly higher than SPMV.L's 4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, XSPX.L has outperformed SPMV.L with an annualized return of 14.72%, while SPMV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.
XSPX.L
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 19.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.46%
- 10Y*
- 14.72%
SPMV.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 10.21%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
XSPX.L vs. SPMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSPX.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 9.12% | 9.46% | 27.43% | 19.97% | -8.90% | 31.28% | 13.93% | 26.82% | 0.30% | 11.07% |
SPMV.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.39% | 3.60% | 20.76% | 4.44% | -0.48% | 26.16% | 4.26% | 26.25% | 0.26% | 6.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSPX.L and SPMV.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XSPX.L and SPMV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSPX.L vs. SPMV.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSPX.L
SPMV.L
XSPX.L vs. SPMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSPX.L | SPMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.19 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 1.97 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.46 | 5.80 | +3.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSPX.L vs. SPMV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -44.87%, which is greater than SPMV.L's maximum drawdown of -25.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPX.L and SPMV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSPX.L | SPMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.87% | -25.15% | -19.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -5.16% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.09% | -14.55% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.09% | -14.55% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.50% | -25.15% | -0.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | -1.54% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -3.39% | -6.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 1.76% | +0.32% |
Volatility
XSPX.L vs. SPMV.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) at 2.69%. This indicates that XSPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSPX.L | SPMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 2.69% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.90% | 7.28% | +0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.07% | 9.59% | +1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.05% | 12.68% | +7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 14.17% | +4.14% |
XSPX.L vs. SPMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSPX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMV.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSPX.L vs. SPMV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSPX.L nor SPMV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XSPX.L and SPMV.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSPX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPMV.L.
XSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPMV.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Net in USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XSPX.L and 0.20% for SPMV.L.
Find the right allocation for XSPX.L and SPMV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer