PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMV.L vs. SPMD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMV.L vs. SPMD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SPMV.L having a 4.24% return and SPMD.L slightly higher at 4.28%.


SPMV.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.14%
6M
4.46%
YTD
4.24%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
9.98%

SPMD.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.20%
6M
4.60%
YTD
4.28%
1Y
10.57%
3Y*
12.79%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMV.L vs. SPMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SPMV.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.24%11.55%18.68%9.94%-11.05%24.98%7.41%31.25%-5.09%
SPMD.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.28%11.59%18.75%9.74%-10.93%24.96%7.60%30.96%-4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMV.L and SPMD.L is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2018

0.98

The correlation between SPMV.L and SPMD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMV.L vs. SPMD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMV.L
SPMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SPMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMD.L
SPMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SPMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMV.L vs. SPMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMV.LSPMD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.69

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.62

6.61

+0.01

SPMV.L vs. SPMD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the SPMD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMV.L and SPMD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMV.L vs. SPMD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMV.L drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, roughly equal to the maximum SPMD.L drawdown of -33.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMV.L and SPMD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMV.LSPMD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.34%

-33.23%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-6.23%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.31%

-12.05%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

-18.66%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.69%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-4.13%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.60%

-0.01%

Volatility

SPMV.L vs. SPMD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L) have volatilities of 1.82% and 1.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMV.LSPMD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

1.83%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.37%

6.37%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.50%

8.46%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.67%

12.60%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.77%

14.56%

-0.79%

SPMV.L vs. SPMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPMV.L and SPMD.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPMV.L vs. SPMD.L - Dividend Comparison

SPMV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SPMD.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.16%1.15%1.28%1.46%1.35%1.27%1.54%1.52%1.13%
SPMV.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SPMV.L and SPMD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMV.L and SPMD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

SPMV.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Net in USD, while SPMD.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMV.L and SPMD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer