XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L
XSPX.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and IUCM.L (iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IUCM.L is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSPX.L returned 15.05%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for IUCM.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XSPX.L is traded in GBp, while IUCM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUCM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSPX.L achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than IUCM.L's 1.98% return.
XSPX.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- 29.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 16.30%
IUCM.L
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 20.81%
- 3Y*
- 23.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- —
XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSPX.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 10.56% | 9.46% | 27.43% | 19.97% | -8.90% | 31.28% | 13.93% | 26.82% | -10.76% |
IUCM.L iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | 1.98% | 17.47% | 41.41% | 47.96% | -33.47% | 23.51% | 19.04% | 25.86% | -8.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSPX.L and IUCM.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XSPX.L and IUCM.L has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSPX.L
IUCM.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XSPX.L
IUCM.L
Financial Services
XSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Communication Services
XSPX.L
IUCM.L
Consumer Cyclical
XSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Healthcare
XSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Industrials
XSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Energy
XSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Utilities
XSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Real Estate
XSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Basic Materials
XSPX.L
IUCM.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSPX.L
IUCM.L
XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSPX.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.25 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 2.67 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.33 | 8.81 | +5.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSPX.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 1.52 | +1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.65 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.71 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, smaller than the maximum IUCM.L drawdown of -38.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPX.L and IUCM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSPX.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.50% | -38.32% | +12.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -8.21% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.09% | -20.74% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.09% | -38.32% | +17.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -4.42% | +4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -8.23% | +4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 2.49% | -0.46% |
Volatility
XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) is 2.62%, while iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that XSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUCM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSPX.L | IUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 4.58% | -1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.15% | 10.51% | -3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.49% | 14.43% | -3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.28% | 19.49% | -5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 20.24% | -4.71% |
XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XSPX.L and IUCM.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSPX.L nor IUCM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XSPX.L and IUCM.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSPX.L and IUCM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
XSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IUCM.L is Communications Equities. XSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IUCM.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.
Find the right allocation for XSPX.L and IUCM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer