PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSPX.L is traded in GBp, while IUCM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUCM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSPX.L achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than IUCM.L's 1.98% return.


XSPX.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.53%
YTD
10.56%
6M
9.85%
1Y
29.08%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*
16.30%

IUCM.L

1D
1.48%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
1.98%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
20.81%
3Y*
23.89%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSPX.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
10.56%9.46%27.43%19.97%-8.90%31.28%13.93%26.82%-10.76%
IUCM.L
iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
1.98%17.47%41.41%47.96%-33.47%23.51%19.04%25.86%-8.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XSPX.L and IUCM.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between XSPX.L and IUCM.L has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSPX.L
IUCM.L

Technology

35.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

11.8%

-

Communication Services

11.2%
99.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

XSPX.L
35.6%
IUCM.L
0.6%

Financial Services

XSPX.L
11.8%
IUCM.L

-

Communication Services

XSPX.L
11.2%
IUCM.L
99.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XSPX.L
10.1%
IUCM.L

-

Healthcare

XSPX.L
8.5%
IUCM.L

-

Industrials

XSPX.L
8.3%
IUCM.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XSPX.L
4.9%
IUCM.L

-

Energy

XSPX.L
3.5%
IUCM.L

-

Utilities

XSPX.L
2.4%
IUCM.L

-

Real Estate

XSPX.L
1.9%
IUCM.L

-

Basic Materials

XSPX.L
1.8%
IUCM.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSPX.L
XSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IUCM.L
IUCM.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IUCM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUCM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSPX.LIUCM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.25

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

2.67

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.33

8.81

+5.52

XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the IUCM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSPX.L and IUCM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSPX.LIUCM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

1.52

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.65

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.71

+0.28

Drawdowns

XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, smaller than the maximum IUCM.L drawdown of -38.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPX.L and IUCM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSPX.LIUCM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.50%

-38.32%

+12.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-8.21%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.09%

-20.74%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.09%

-38.32%

+17.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-4.42%

+4.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-8.23%

+4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.49%

-0.46%

Volatility

XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) is 2.62%, while iShares S&P 500 Communication Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUCM.L) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that XSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUCM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSPX.LIUCM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

4.58%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.15%

10.51%

-3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49%

14.43%

-3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.28%

19.49%

-5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.53%

20.24%

-4.71%

XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XSPX.L and IUCM.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSPX.L vs. IUCM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSPX.L nor IUCM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XSPX.L and IUCM.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSPX.L and IUCM.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

XSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IUCM.L is Communications Equities. XSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IUCM.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSPX.L and IUCM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer