XSPX.L vs. ICSU.L
XSPX.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and ICSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while ICSU.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSPX.L returned 15.05%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for ICSU.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
XSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSPX.L achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than ICSU.L's 6.60% return.
XSPX.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- 29.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 16.30%
ICSU.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- —
XSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSPX.L Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 10.56% | 9.46% | 27.43% | 19.97% | -8.90% | 31.28% | 13.93% | 26.82% | 0.30% | 7.75% |
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.60% | -3.20% | 16.26% | -5.83% | 11.78% | 19.63% | 5.64% | 22.78% | -3.96% | -2.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSPX.L and ICSU.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.52 |
The correlation between XSPX.L and ICSU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSPX.L
ICSU.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XSPX.L
ICSU.L
-
Financial Services
XSPX.L
ICSU.L
-
Communication Services
XSPX.L
ICSU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSPX.L
ICSU.L
Healthcare
XSPX.L
ICSU.L
-
Industrials
XSPX.L
ICSU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XSPX.L
ICSU.L
Energy
XSPX.L
ICSU.L
-
Utilities
XSPX.L
ICSU.L
-
Real Estate
XSPX.L
ICSU.L
-
Basic Materials
XSPX.L
ICSU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSPX.L vs. ICSU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSPX.L
ICSU.L
XSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSPX.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.05 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 0.34 | +3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.33 | 0.82 | +13.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSPX.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 0.22 | +2.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.59 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.48 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
XSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, which is greater than ICSU.L's maximum drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPX.L and ICSU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSPX.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.50% | -18.54% | -6.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -9.24% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.09% | -11.59% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.09% | -13.70% | -7.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -7.40% | +7.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -4.93% | +1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 3.87% | -1.84% |
Volatility
XSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) is 2.62%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that XSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSPX.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 6.57% | -3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.15% | 11.97% | -4.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.49% | 14.37% | -3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.28% | 13.45% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 14.31% | +1.22% |
XSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XSPX.L and ICSU.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSPX.L nor ICSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XSPX.L and ICSU.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSPX.L and ICSU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
XSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while ICSU.L is Consumer Staples Equities. XSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.
Find the right allocation for XSPX.L and ICSU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer