XSPR.L vs. XDEQ.L
XSPR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and XDEQ.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XSPR.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XDEQ.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSPR.L returned 13.21%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for XDEQ.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSPR.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEQ.L.
Performance
XSPR.L vs. XDEQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSPR.L achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly lower than XDEQ.L's 8.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XSPR.L having a 13.21% annualized return and XDEQ.L not far ahead at 13.78%.
XSPR.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 6.58%
- YTD
- 8.03%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 11.13%
- 3Y*
- 10.17%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
XDEQ.L
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 8.63%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 22.27%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.78%
XSPR.L vs. XDEQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSPR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 8.03% | 14.12% | -6.12% | 16.07% | -7.66% | 18.51% | 17.88% | 16.55% | -11.25% | 26.40% |
XDEQ.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 8.63% | 7.52% | 18.91% | 19.22% | -9.44% | 24.28% | 11.14% | 30.48% | -5.16% | 12.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSPR.L and XDEQ.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2014 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, XSPR.L and XDEQ.L have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.
XSPR.L vs. XDEQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSPR.L
XDEQ.L
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
XSPR.L
XDEQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
XSPR.L
XDEQ.L
Communication Services
XSPR.L
-
XDEQ.L
Consumer Defensive
XSPR.L
-
XDEQ.L
Energy
XSPR.L
-
XDEQ.L
Financial Services
XSPR.L
-
XDEQ.L
Healthcare
XSPR.L
-
XDEQ.L
Industrials
XSPR.L
-
XDEQ.L
Real Estate
XSPR.L
-
XDEQ.L
Technology
XSPR.L
-
XDEQ.L
Utilities
XSPR.L
-
XDEQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSPR.L vs. XDEQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSPR.L
XDEQ.L
XSPR.L vs. XDEQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSPR.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSPR.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.43 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 3.21 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.23 | 13.32 | -12.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSPR.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 2.26 | -1.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.87 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 1.13 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 1.21 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
XSPR.L vs. XDEQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSPR.L drawdown since its inception was -68.41%, which is greater than XDEQ.L's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPR.L and XDEQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSPR.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.41% | -23.79% | -44.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.78% | -6.90% | -11.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.78% | -17.96% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.71% | -17.96% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.80% | -23.79% | -18.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.87% | 0.00% | -4.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.82% | -3.78% | -17.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.06% | 1.67% | +7.39% |
Volatility
XSPR.L vs. XDEQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSPR.L) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) at 2.57%. This indicates that XSPR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSPR.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.25% | 2.57% | +3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.25% | 7.12% | +7.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.45% | 9.81% | +16.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 13.37% | +9.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.15% | 16.89% | +11.26% |
XSPR.L vs. XDEQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSPR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEQ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSPR.L vs. XDEQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSPR.L nor XDEQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XSPR.L and XDEQ.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSPR.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSPR.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEQ.L.
XSPR.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XDEQ.L is Global Equities. XSPR.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XDEQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSPR.L and 0.25% for XDEQ.L.
Find the right allocation for XSPR.L and XDEQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer